On 06/11/2011 10:54 PM, John H. Outlan CPA wrote:
LeighLinux123 is a Fedora Forum Admin, and he was active with us for a
whilebut those packages have worked fine for me.
Any chance of talking him into doing a Thunderbird package?
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Todd And Margo Chester <
toddandma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 03:30 PM, John H. Outlan CPA wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Alexander Hunt <
> alexander.d.h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 06/02/2011 04:44 AM, Hugo Berus wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
On 06/02/2011 03:30 PM, John H. Outlan CPA wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Alexander
Hunt
wrote:
On 06/02/2011 04:44 AM, Hugo Berus wrote:
6.
This suggests to me that it is time to explore Firefox 4.
--
Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge
a.c.aitchi...@dpmms.cam.ac.uk http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna
02/06/2011 12:44 +0200, Hugo Berus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2 June 2011 11:37, Dr Andrew C Aitchison
> wrote:
> > My feeling is that Red Hat Firefox is too far
> > behind the curve for bugs to get fixed.
>
> That, and Google will stop support for firefox 3.6 eventually,
3.5, not 3.6
> according to
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Alexander Hunt <
alexander.d.h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 04:44 AM, Hugo Berus wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2 June 2011 11:37, Dr Andrew C Aitchison
> wrote:
>
> My feeling is that Red Hat Firefox is too far
> behind the curve for bugs to get fixed.
>
>
On 06/02/2011 04:44 AM, Hugo Berus wrote:
Hi,
On 2 June 2011 11:37, Dr Andrew C Aitchison
wrote:
My feeling is that Red Hat Firefox is too far
behind the curve for bugs to get fixed.
That, and Google will stop support for firefox 3.6 eventually,
according to this blogpost
http://gmailblog.bl
Hi,
On 2 June 2011 11:37, Dr Andrew C Aitchison
wrote:
> My feeling is that Red Hat Firefox is too far
> behind the curve for bugs to get fixed.
That, and Google will stop support for firefox 3.6 eventually,
according to this blogpost
http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/our-plans-to-support-mo
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
Hi All,
Under SL6, are we stuck with Firefox 3.6? Is there some plan
to support Firefox 4 in our future? (I have just been using the
binary under CentOS 5.6.)
Red Hat switched from Firefox 1.5 to Firefox 3.0 with RHEL 5.2
http
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 14:39, Todd And Margo Chester
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Under SL6, are we stuck with Firefox 3.6? Is there some plan
> to support Firefox 4 in our future? (I have just been using the
> binary under CentOS 5.6.)
I think this was asked earlier with 5.x. Scie
Hi All,
Under SL6, are we stuck with Firefox 3.6? Is there some plan
to support Firefox 4 in our future? (I have just been using the
binary under CentOS 5.6.)
Many thanks,
-T
On 03/26/2011 08:42 AM, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
The firefox developers, in their reciprocally infinite wisdom,
are pushing Firefox 4, which requires libstdc++.so.6 with
GLIBCXX_3.4.9 . The available libstdc++.i386 0:4.1.2-50.el5
RPM contains only GLIBCXX_3.4.8 . You can read more about it
here
On 03/26/2011 04:48 PM, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 01:42:20AM -0700, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
The firefox developers, in their reciprocally infinite wisdom,
...
Or perhaps the firefox developers should be encouraged (with
red hot encouragement irons) to support the older librar
Perhaps I need another piece of code which automatically holds
any email sent after midnight until I've confirmed it 8 hours
later. That would help with sleep-deprived oropedal insertion,
and might be helpful for security, too.
Keith
I think gmail has something like that :D
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
[mailto:owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov] On Behalf Of Vaclav
Mocek
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 12:54 PM
To: SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Subject: Re: SL5, Firefox 4 and libstdc++
On 03
Keith
Lofstrom
Sent: 26 March 2011 16:48
To: kei...@keithl.com
Cc: Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide
Subject: Firefox 4 - apology
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 01:42:20AM -0700, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> The firefox developers, in their reciprocally infinite wisdom,
...
> Or perhaps
On 03/26/2011 08:42 AM, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
The firefox developers, in their reciprocally infinite wisdom,
are pushing Firefox 4, which requires libstdc++.so.6 with
GLIBCXX_3.4.9 . The available libstdc++.i386 0:4.1.2-50.el5
RPM contains only GLIBCXX_3.4.8 . You can read more about it
here
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 01:42:20AM -0700, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> The firefox developers, in their reciprocally infinite wisdom,
...
> Or perhaps the firefox developers should be encouraged (with
> red hot encouragement irons) to support the older library,
> and proper upgrades. Abandoning million
The firefox developers, in their reciprocally infinite wisdom,
are pushing Firefox 4, which requires libstdc++.so.6 with
GLIBCXX_3.4.9 . The available libstdc++.i386 0:4.1.2-50.el5
RPM contains only GLIBCXX_3.4.8 . You can read more about it
here: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=23
19 matches
Mail list logo