On 05/26/2011 08:29 AM, Zack Yovel wrote:
2011/5/26 Phong Nguyen <pho...@fnal.gov <mailto:pho...@fnal.gov>>
On 25 May 2011, at 1557, Zack Yovel wrote:
>
> Funny, the reason I need windows is virtualization. I have tons
of Hyper-V machines that I need for a course I take, and from what
I've seen QEMU/KVM are missing 'revert snapshot'-like feature which
is extremely important to me. Tried using these VHD's in Virtualbox,
It's doesn't work really good. so for now, windows host should stay.
If you're going to be using Hyper-V (either in bare-metal or full
Windows Server mode) will you need to bother with dual-booting? Why
not just run Linux virtualized?
- Phong
1. Hyper-V does not support RHEL. The only linux distro it supports is SUSE.
I'm not quite sure where you read that, but according to RedHat it does
http://www.redhat.com/promo/svvp/
I also know of a couple of places that have to use Hyper-V for their
virtualization infrastructure, and they are running SL5.
I have no comment on performance, I just know that it runs.
Troy
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson daw...@fnal.gov (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/SCF/FEF/SLSMS Group
__________________________________________________
