On Friday, July 20, 2012 08:27:05 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> That's why I'm calling it an "unannounced release". The lack of
> tentative release dates for CentOS has been only one of the reasons,
> for me at least, to use Scientific Linux instead wherever possible. It
> was a big problem with th
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07/11/2012 03:44 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> I'm perhaps being unclear, An announcemenbt that goes out at the same
>> time as the release itself is not helpful. They've selected as a
>
> Mirrors know about the upcoming release
On 18/07/12 14:24, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 07/18/2012 01:58 PM, James Holland wrote:
Would love to see this testing process/code documented somewhere and
what the implications are. So we might be able to better and improve the
process in CentOS as well.
Is there a place where you document the
Hey!
On 07/18/2012 02:00 PM, zxq9 wrote:
> I'm sure Connie or Pat would be the people to ask about the QA process
> and probably happy to discuss is -- the site/wiki isn't always the focus
> at SL, it seems (forums aside, I think a lot of us here read/edit your
> wiki over at CentOS for non-dev st
On 07/18/2012 01:58 PM, James Holland wrote:
>> Would love to see this testing process/code documented somewhere and
>> what the implications are. So we might be able to better and improve the
>> process in CentOS as well.
>
> Is there a place where you document the CentOS processes?
>
we are st
On 07/18/2012 09:36 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 07/11/2012 02:01 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
Sure, CentOS do things differently. If it compiles, ship it.
erm. No. Thats not how CentOS does it.
SL will more than likely do a Beta, RC, then release - just like they
have with each other point relea
On 18/07/12 13:36, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 07/11/2012 02:01 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
Sure, CentOS do things differently. If it compiles, ship it.
erm. No. Thats not how CentOS does it.
SL will more than likely do a Beta, RC, then release - just like they
have with each other point release.
On 07/11/2012 02:01 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
> Sure, CentOS do things differently. If it compiles, ship it.
erm. No. Thats not how CentOS does it.
> SL will more than likely do a Beta, RC, then release - just like they
> have with each other point release.
Would love to see this testing process/c
Hi,
On 07/11/2012 03:44 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> I'm perhaps being unclear, An announcemenbt that goes out at the same
> time as the release itself is not helpful. They've selected as a
Mirrors know about the upcoming release well in advance - remember that
we seed in excess of 1200 externa
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
Yawn. My favourite bug (6.2 ypserv does not respond to NIS broadcasts,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829475)
did not make 6.3, got pushed to 6.4.
You are not authorized to access bug #829475.
Can you tell us more ?
Confi
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 06:54:59AM +0100, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>
> >Yawn. My favourite bug (6.2 ypserv does not respond to NIS broadcasts,
> >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829475)
> >did not make 6.3, got pushed to 6.4.
>
>
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
Yawn. My favourite bug (6.2 ypserv does not respond to NIS broadcasts,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829475)
did not make 6.3, got pushed to 6.4.
You are not authorized to access bug #829475.
Can you tell us more ?
--
Dr.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:49:29PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > A particular client's mirror of CentOS exploded today with the
> > unannounced CentOS 6.3 release. Congratulations to them for such quick
> > work: is there a nomin
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:49:29PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> A particular client's mirror of CentOS exploded today with the
> unannounced CentOS 6.3 release. Congratulations to them for such quick
> work: is there a nominal release date for SL 6.3, so I can make sure
> to allocate disk spac
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Alan Bartlett wrote:
> On 11 July 2012 02:10, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Steven Haigh wrote:
>>> On 11/07/2012 10:49 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
A particular client's mirror of CentOS exploded today with the
unannounced CentO
On 11 July 2012 02:10, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Steven Haigh wrote:
>> On 11/07/2012 10:49 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>> A particular client's mirror of CentOS exploded today with the
>>> unannounced CentOS 6.3 release. Congratulations to them for such quick
>>> wor
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Steven Haigh wrote:
> On 11/07/2012 10:49 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> A particular client's mirror of CentOS exploded today with the
>> unannounced CentOS 6.3 release. Congratulations to them for such quick
>> work: is there a nominal release date for SL 6.3, s
On 11/07/2012 10:49 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> A particular client's mirror of CentOS exploded today with the
> unannounced CentOS 6.3 release. Congratulations to them for such quick
> work: is there a nominal release date for SL 6.3, so I can make sure
> to allocate disk space?
What is it wi
A particular client's mirror of CentOS exploded today with the
unannounced CentOS 6.3 release. Congratulations to them for such quick
work: is there a nominal release date for SL 6.3, so I can make sure
to allocate disk space?
I've actually got a mock setup, running SL 6.2, chewing its way
through
19 matches
Mail list logo
