Hi!
The version of the package currently available in SL6 is
vsftpd-2.2.2-6.el6_0.1.x86_64, while RHEL6 apparently ships
vsftpd-2.2.2-11.el6 [1]. Can you please update it, as it contains a bugfix
that is important for our systems.
Kind regards,
Dennis Schridde
[1]
On 06/08/2012 11:27 AM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Hi!
The version of the package currently available in SL6 is
vsftpd-2.2.2-6.el6_0.1.x86_64, while RHEL6 apparently ships
vsftpd-2.2.2-11.el6 [1]. Can you please update it, as it contains a bugfix
that is important for our systems.
Kind regards,
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Matthias Schroeder
matthias.schro...@cern.ch wrote:
On 06/08/2012 11:27 AM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Hi!
The version of the package currently available in SL6 is
vsftpd-2.2.2-6.el6_0.1.x86_64, while RHEL6 apparently ships
vsftpd-2.2.2-11.el6 [1]. Can you
On 06/08/2012 08:44 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Matthias Schroeder matthias.schro...@cern.ch
mailto:matthias.schro...@cern.ch wrote:
On 06/08/2012 11:27 AM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Hi!
The version of the package currently available in SL6
And in this day and age with password sniffing
going on over local networks by zombied machines and happening as a matter
of government policy worldwide in data centers, and the historic firewall
wackiness with FTP's 2 channel communications, *WHY* is your client using
FTP for anything that
On 06/08/2012 04:27 AM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Hi!
The version of the package currently available in SL6 is
vsftpd-2.2.2-6.el6_0.1.x86_64, while RHEL6 apparently ships
vsftpd-2.2.2-11.el6 [1]. Can you please update it, as it contains a bugfix
that is important for our systems.
Kind regards,
On 06/08/2012 08:47 AM, Chris Schanzle wrote:
[As an aside, I'm getting http internal server error code 500 out of
www.scientificlinux.org now.]
Thanks for the report! I'll see about getting this fixed.
--
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux Developer
Am Freitag, 8. Juni 2012, 09:47:48 schrieben Sie:
Per http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0001.html , you should not be
looking for vsftpd-2.2.2-11.el6. I was able to find in a mirror ...
/scientific/6x/x86_64/updates/fastbugs/vsftpd-2.2.2-6.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm
Thanks for that hint!
Am Freitag, 8. Juni 2012, 12:58:53 schrieben Sie:
On 06/08/2012 11:27 AM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Hi!
The version of the package currently available in SL6 is
vsftpd-2.2.2-6.el6_0.1.x86_64, while RHEL6 apparently ships
vsftpd-2.2.2-11.el6 [1]. Can you please update it, as it contains a
Hello everyone!
Am Freitag, 8. Juni 2012, 08:44:35 schrieben Sie:
And in this day and age with password sniffing
going on over local networks by zombied machines and happening as a matter
of government policy worldwide in data centers, and the historic firewall
wackiness with FTP's 2 channel
If not else, you might wanna consider using stunnel for vsftpd too to
get it over SSL for the users by pre-sharing the certs.
So you wouldn't even have to change much at all in your configuration.
Cheers,
Andras
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 16:46:56 +0200
Dennis Schridde devuran...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
On 06/08/2012 04:28 PM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Am Freitag, 8. Juni 2012, 12:58:53 schrieben Sie:
On 06/08/2012 11:27 AM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Hi!
The version of the package currently available in SL6 is
vsftpd-2.2.2-6.el6_0.1.x86_64,
Are you sure about this? in fastbugs I see
Hi Matthias and everyone else!
Am Freitag, 8. Juni 2012, 17:21:42 schrieben Sie:
On 06/08/2012 04:28 PM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Am Freitag, 8. Juni 2012, 12:58:53 schrieben Sie:
On 06/08/2012 11:27 AM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
The version of the package currently available in SL6 is
On 06/08/2012 08:57 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
On 06/08/2012 08:47 AM, Chris Schanzle wrote:
[As an aside, I'm getting http internal server error code 500 out of
www.scientificlinux.org now.]
Thanks for the report! I'll see about getting this fixed.
It is back up again.
--
Pat Riehecky
On 2012/06/08 05:44, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
And in this day and age with password sniffing going on over
local networks by zombied machines and happening as a matter of government
policy worldwide in data centers, and the historic firewall wackiness with FTP's
2 channel communications, *WHY*
On 2012/06/08 07:46, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Hello everyone!
Am Freitag, 8. Juni 2012, 08:44:35 schrieben Sie:
...
Or are they using FTPS?
So far I found no client that reliably supports FTPS. Especially nothing that
comes with the OS by default (I tried Chrome, Firefox, KDE/Dolphin). Can you
I'm going to merge a few replies here.
vsftpd is referred to as very secure ftp daemon. This, unfortunately,
means absolutely nothing in terms of the FTP protocol itself. It refers to
its well-written code, its simple and legible and reliable configuration
options, and the complete discard of the
17 matches
Mail list logo
