Re: SL 4.x problems with ATI fglrx after kernel-update

2009-06-11 Thread Jaroslaw Polok
Hi all we currently have no real RedHat or CentOS systems running at Aachen. So, we cannot check if the problem with the drivers is ScientificLinux-made or a general problem of this kernel version. This seems to be generic problem with the -78.0.22.EL kernel (-89.EL too BTW): we see it as

Re: SL 4.x problems with ATI fglrx after kernel-update

2009-05-11 Thread Michael Bontenackels
Hi, we currently have no real RedHat or CentOS systems running at Aachen. So, we cannot check if the problem with the drivers is ScientificLinux-made or a general problem of this kernel version. Michael. Troy Dawson schrieb: Hi All, Is this happening with CentOS and real RedHat systems as

SL 4.x problems with ATI fglrx after kernel-update

2009-05-08 Thread Michael Bontenackels
Hello, we encountered a problem with the newest kernel for SL 4.x on our institute cluster: after installing the new kernel-smp-2.6.9-78.0.22.EL.i686 on our machines the ATI Catalyst 9.3/9.4 drivers crash when X is started. All kernel modules have been rebuilt suiting to the new kernel. The

Re: SL 4.x problems with ATI fglrx after kernel-update

2009-05-08 Thread Matthias Schroeder
Hi, I have no answer to your questions, but we have problems with the .22 kernel and ati-gflrx drivers. For some machines the screen simply stays black, and X is completely stuck. Apparently while initialising the hardware acceleration. Disabling that gives you a working X, but slow is not

Re: SL 4.x problems with ATI fglrx after kernel-update

2009-05-08 Thread Troy Dawson
Hi All, Is this happening with CentOS and real RedHat systems as well? Has anyone tried using one of their kernels? I just want to make sure that it isn't something we did. Troy Matthias Schroeder wrote: Hi, I have no answer to your questions, but we have problems with the .22 kernel and