On 2012-06-08, at 10:27 PM, Mark Rousell wrote:
On 26/03/2012 19:33, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
no-one received, online videos, founders are demonstrating, preorder
now and available soon is the definition of vaporware.
One official vendor is:
On 28 June 2012 22:31, Christopher Tooley ctoo...@uvic.ca wrote:
Further update:
I have a Raspberry Pi in my grubby little paws right now - so, yeah,
definitely not vaporware ;)
-Chris
You're not the only one. I received mine today. :)
Alan.
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Mark Rousell
markr-scientific-li...@signal100.com wrote:
On 26/03/2012 19:33, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:02:41AM -0700, Christopher Tooley wrote:
On 2012-03-26, at 10:08 AM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at
On Jun 9, 2012, at 1:01 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Mark Rousell
markr-scientific-li...@signal100.com wrote:
On 26/03/2012 19:33, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:02:41AM -0700, Christopher Tooley wrote:
On 2012-03-26, at 10:08
. They are in SRPMS/changed directory on the RedSleeve
mirror. (Note: About 5 of those 109 were changed in order to remove
the upstream branding which isn't relevant to the SL effort as it is
already taken care of. It is quite well known what those are.)
Istm that whether or not SL-on-ARM ever becomes
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
Not likely. SL is a rebuild of an upstream vendor's industry class server
OS. If our favorite upstream vendor goes there, then that could happen. But
if you look at Fedora as the leading edge of what that vendor plans
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not likely. SL is a rebuild of an upstream vendor's industry
class server
OS. If our favorite upstream vendor goes there, then that could happen.
But
if you look at Fedora as the leading edge of what that vendor
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Gordan Bobic gor...@redsleeve.org wrote:
9 months ago it would have been a big undertaking. Today it would not be a
big undertaking at all. All the hard work has already been done in
RedSleeve (http://www.redsleeve.org). So you could just treat RS as the
This sounds very interesting for my project.thank you!!!
--
Please excuse my brevity.
Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Gordan Bobic gor...@redsleeve.org wrote:
9 months ago it would have been a big undertaking. Today it would not be a big
undertaking at
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Gordan Bobic gor...@redsleeve.org wrote:
On 09/06/2012 15:01, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Gordan Bobic gor...@redsleeve.org
mailto:gor...@redsleeve.org wrote:
9 months ago it would have been a big undertaking. Today it would
On 26/03/2012 19:33, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:02:41AM -0700, Christopher Tooley wrote:
On 2012-03-26, at 10:08 AM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:38:31AM +0100, Gordan Bobic wrote:
http://www.redsleeve.org/
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012, Gordan Bobic wrote:
I recently became aware that the CentOS guys are working on this as of
recently, so I thought I'd see if any SL users may also be interested in such
a thing. A similar ARM distro already exists, though. Those interested in an
ARM port may want to take
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:38:31AM +0100, Gordan Bobic wrote:
... similar ARM distro ...
http://www.redsleeve.org/
But this is very theoretical as there are no common ARM hardware to run on.
(links to newegg, please!)
But this is very useful as we move from embedded Intel to embeded ARM
On 2012-03-26, at 8:10 AM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:38:31AM +0100, Gordan Bobic wrote:
... similar ARM distro ...
http://www.redsleeve.org/
But this is very theoretical as there are no common ARM hardware to run on.
(links to newegg, please!)
But this
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:38:31AM +0100, Gordan Bobic wrote:
http://www.redsleeve.org/
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 09:18:19AM -0700, Christopher Tooley wrote:
http://www.raspberrypi.org/
As I understand, the raspberry machine does not exist. As reported elsewhere,
the first batch of
On 2012-03-26, at 10:08 AM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:38:31AM +0100, Gordan Bobic wrote:
http://www.redsleeve.org/
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 09:18:19AM -0700, Christopher Tooley wrote:
http://www.raspberrypi.org/
As I understand, the raspberry machine does not
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:02:41AM -0700, Christopher Tooley wrote:
On 2012-03-26, at 10:08 AM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:38:31AM +0100, Gordan Bobic wrote:
http://www.redsleeve.org/
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 09:18:19AM -0700, Christopher Tooley wrote:
On 03/26/2012 04:10 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:38:31AM +0100, Gordan Bobic wrote:
... similar ARM distro ...
http://www.redsleeve.org/
But this is very theoretical as there are no common ARM hardware to run on.
(links to newegg, please!)
There doesn't need
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 07:40:08PM +0100, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 03/26/2012 04:10 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:38:31AM +0100, Gordan Bobic wrote:
... similar ARM distro ...
http://www.redsleeve.org/
But this is very theoretical as there are no common ARM
On 03/26/2012 07:53 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 07:40:08PM +0100, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 03/26/2012 04:10 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:38:31AM +0100, Gordan Bobic wrote:
... similar ARM distro ...
http://www.redsleeve.org/
But this
20 matches
Mail list logo
