Franchisseur Robert wrote:
-- Le (On) 2010-08-07 +0200 à (at) 13:41:11 grigory rybkin écrivit (wrote): --
Hello,
As for the origianl question, lsb_release takes the version from
/etc/redhat-release, which is provided by package sl-release
(version 5.5 for SL 5.5).
To see its info
rpm -qf /etc/
-- Le (On) 2010-08-07 +0200 à (at) 13:41:11 grigory rybkin écrivit (wrote): --
> Hello,
>
> As for the origianl question, lsb_release takes the version from
> /etc/redhat-release, which is provided by package sl-release
> (version 5.5 for SL 5.5).
> To see its info
> rpm -qf /etc/redhat-release -
Hello,
As for the origianl question, lsb_release takes the version from
/etc/redhat-release, which is provided by package sl-release
(version 5.5 for SL 5.5).
To see its info
rpm -qf /etc/redhat-release -i
Best regards,
Gregory
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Franchisseur Robert <
robert.franch
-- Le (On) 2010-08-02 -0700 à (at) 12:15:26 Akemi Yagi écrivit (wrote): --
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Michèle Perucic
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have installed SL 5.2 a couple of years ago and since then my system is
> > always up to date.
> > I also have the latest kernel (2.6.18-194.8.1
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Michèle Perucic
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have installed SL 5.2 a couple of years ago and since then my system is
> always up to date.
> I also have the latest kernel (2.6.18-194.8.1.el5).
> The question is: Why does the release still show up as 5.2 (and not 5.5)?
>
> # l
Hi,
I have installed SL 5.2 a couple of years ago and since then my system
is always up to date.
I also have the latest kernel (2.6.18-194.8.1.el5).
The question is: Why does the release still show up as 5.2 (and not 5.5)?
# lsb_release -id
Distributor ID: ScientificSL
Description:Scientif
