.
From: lancebaynes87 lancebayne...@zoho.com
To: Scientific-Linux scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 7:28 AM
Subject: Scientific-Linux: which version has bigger support date?
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/21692/scientific-linux-which
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/21692/scientific-linux-which-version-has-bigger-support-date
We have several Desktop PC's that has Fedora 14 installed. Great!
But: We need a Linux distro that doesn't need a reinstall in every half
year. (no, dist-upgrade is not an option!).
We found
Hi lancebaynes87!
On 2011.09.29 at 04:28:18 -0700, lancebaynes87 wrote next:
SOLUTION #2
if we install the:
http://www.osst.co.uk/Download/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/iso/SL-61-x86_64-2011-07-27-Install-DVD.iso.torrent
that's a rolling release. Now I haven't used any rolling release
Major concern about rolling upgrades is that you never really know the side
effects.
We have been on SL 5.6 for a long time and everything works that we use.
If SL 6.X is going to be supported for the foreseeable future then we will
make the upgrade to all of our systems.
We use SL 5.6 to run
Hi Larry Linder!
On 2011.09.29 at 09:32:51 -0400, Larry Linder wrote next:
Major concern about rolling upgrades is that you never really know the side
effects.
We have been on SL 5.6 for a long time and everything works that we use.
If SL 6.X is going to be supported for the foreseeable
