Hi,
we're currently evaluating a migration from Centos 5 to SL6. But I have some
questions about repositories:
We have a local repository were our servers get their updates from. But I'm
unsure, what I exaclty have to mirror. On the FTP there are the following
directories:
- 6
- 6.0
-
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:31 AM, Marc Muehlfeld
marc.muehlf...@medizinische-genetik.de wrote:
Hi,
we're currently evaluating a migration from Centos 5 to SL6. But I have some
questions about repositories:
We have a local repository were our servers get their updates from. But I'm
unsure,
On 05/25/2011 02:31 AM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
Hi,
we're currently evaluating a migration from Centos 5 to SL6. But I have some
questions about repositories:
We have a local repository were our servers get their updates from. But I'm
unsure, what I exaclty have to mirror. On the FTP there are
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Troy Dawson daw...@fnal.gov wrote:
On 05/25/2011 02:31 AM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
Question 2: The default *.repo uses the $releasever variable, which is
resolved to 6.0. If we plan to always have the newest (minor) version
after
every update, I think I have to
On 05/25/2011 07:13 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:31 AM, Marc Muehlfeld
marc.muehlf...@medizinische-genetik.de wrote:
Hi,
we're currently evaluating a migration from Centos 5 to SL6. But I have some
questions about repositories:
We have a local repository were our
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Troy Dawson daw...@fnal.gov wrote:
This is where SL differs from both RHEL and CentOS.
We do not force you to update to the latest release.
If a person installs SL 6.0, they will stay at SL 6.0, only getting the
security errata, until they wish to update.
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
snip
If you're setting up an internal mirror for whatever reason (which I
do for running mock), be sure to use rsync or ftp in order to
replicate the symlinks and save a *lot* of download and disk resource.
And if you use rsync be sure to use the
