eally understand why people use it... Let alone
why I have to use a java SSL-VPN application!
So anyway, I have been trying and trying to get Sun Java 6 working on
SL. The command line version seems to work well enough for jgnash,
which is the only thing I've used it for so far. But the Fire
to
admit that I can't really understand why people use it... Let alone
why I have to use a java SSL-VPN application!
So anyway, I have been trying and trying to get Sun Java 6 working on
SL. The command line version seems to work well enough for jgnash,
which is the only thing I've used
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Urs Beyerle wrote:
Michael H. Semcheski wrote:
Hello,
Yum says I have gcj 1.4.2 and java-1.5.0-sun-compat.noarch installed.
I downloaded the java 6 jre from java.com as a binary installer, which
unpacks to an rpm and installed it.
I've created symlinks to the sun p
I can't really understand why people use it... Let alone
> why I have to use a java SSL-VPN application!
>
> So anyway, I have been trying and trying to get Sun Java 6 working on
> SL. The command line version seems to work well enough for jgnash,
> which is the only t
So I haven't yet tried installing the non-rpm binary, that's probably
next on the list. But, I found that running 'java -jar myapp.jar',
and I changed the symlink in /etc/alternatives/java to point to
/usr/java/default/bin/java. Now, running 'java -version' from the
command line tells me I have
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Michael H. Semcheski wrote:
So I haven't yet tried installing the non-rpm binary, that's probably
next on the list. But, I found that running 'java -jar myapp.jar',
and I changed the symlink in /etc/alternatives/java to point to
/usr/java/default/bin/java. Now, running 'ja
