On 02/28/2012 05:05 PM, Chris Schanzle wrote:
On 02/28/2012 02:25 PM, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote:
On 2012.02.28 at 11:32:17 -0500, Wayne Betts wrote next:
We have a couple of Scientific Linux 6.1 NFS servers. I looked at
/proc/net/rpc/nfsd and was surprised to see on both of them that
the thr
On 02/28/2012 02:25 PM, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote:
On 2012.02.28 at 11:32:17 -0500, Wayne Betts wrote next:
We have a couple of Scientific Linux 6.1 NFS servers. I looked at
/proc/net/rpc/nfsd and was surprised to see on both of them that
the thread histogram is all zero:
# cat /proc/net/rpc/
Hi Wayne Betts!
On 2012.02.28 at 11:32:17 -0500, Wayne Betts wrote next:
> We have a couple of Scientific Linux 6.1 NFS servers. I looked at
> /proc/net/rpc/nfsd and was surprised to see on both of them that
> the thread histogram is all zero:
>
> # cat /proc/net/rpc/nfsd | grep th
> th 8 0
We have a couple of Scientific Linux 6.1 NFS servers. I looked at
/proc/net/rpc/nfsd and was surprised to see on both of them that
the thread histogram is all zero:
# cat /proc/net/rpc/nfsd | grep th
th 8 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
There are clients using on
