Mike, that is scary in its possible truth...
Mike Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Cause Hollywood has lost it's
way. I might as well go get the rights
to M.A.S.K. or to Gem and the Holograms..find a pop star and produce
the movie.
On Dec 10, 2007 9:25 PM, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Cause Hollywood has lost it's way. I might as well go get the rights
to M.A.S.K. or to Gem and the Holograms..find a pop star and produce
the movie.
On Dec 10, 2007 9:25 PM, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yes, Keith, it sucked bilge water. And, again, I'm forced to quote my
> shou
Yes, Keith, it sucked bilge water. And, again, I'm forced to quote my
should-be-patented mantra...
"Why?"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Didn't "Alexander" suck? Of course, the director and writer matter
more. I have no clue what tack they'll take for this one. Part of feels this is
a
Didn't "Alexander" suck? Of course, the director and writer matter more. I have
no clue what tack they'll take for this one. Part of feels this is about as
iffy as someone trying to remake "Citizen Kane".
-- Original message --
From: "Mike Street" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pr
Producer Thomas Schuehly ("Alexander") has acquired the remake rights
to Fritz Lang's 1927 silent sci-fi classic "Metropolis" reports
Variety.
Considered one of the most expensive films of its time, the movie is
set in 2026 in a massive city-state characterized by its monumental
skyscrapers and ar
