It was a carbine, Mr Worf.
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:
They had to justify the $100 million it took to develop it and the high
per unit ticket cost later on. For some reason Americans keep thinking of
the most expensive and complex way to do the
When was the last time that anyone has heard the phrase cheap and reliable
come out of a politician's mouth?
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Martin Baxter martinbaxt...@gmail.comwrote:
It was a carbine, Mr Worf.
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:
There's a dirty joke in there somewhere... got it.
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:
When was the last time that anyone has heard the phrase cheap and reliable
come out of a politician's mouth?
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Martin Baxter
Oh, yeah, Mr Worf. For years, they've called the AK The Terrorist's Weapon
of Choice', for exactly that reason. One would think that, instead of trying
to make more technologically superior weapons, the US would aim for the
simplicity of the Russian-made rifle.
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 12:55 AM,
They had to justify the $100 million it took to develop it and the high
per unit ticket cost later on. For some reason Americans keep thinking of
the most expensive and complex way to do the exact same job. Then they act
surprised when something malfunctions on it.
I like the weapon that the
The show Ground War discusses the history of weapons and what are being
currently used on the battlefield. An example was the segment on the AK47 as
compared to the M16. The expert said that it was like comparing a pick up
truck to a Lamborghini. A demonstration of the reliability of the AK47
