Re: [scifinoir2] Re: How much of a Geek are you?

2005-10-02 Thread Astromancer
I got two wrong...so I guess I'm not a proper geek...lol...How sad is it to be a wannabe geek??? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Same here, so I eliminated the choices for one that seemed more in line with what they were referencing. And *that* is proof that standardized multiple choice tests don't alw

RE: [scifinoir2] Re: How much of a Geek are you?

2005-09-28 Thread Keith Johnson
Every now and then... -Original Message- From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brent Wodehouse Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 16:08 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: How much of a Geek are you? Don't you guys

Re: [scifinoir2] Re: How much of a Geek are you?

2005-09-28 Thread Brent Wodehouse
Don't you guys read 'Foxtrot'? :-) Brent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Same here, so I eliminated the choices for one that seemed more in line >with what they were referencing. And *that* is proof that standardized >multiple choice tests don't always measure intelligence. And as for >racial fact

Re: [scifinoir2] Re: How much of a Geek are you?

2005-09-28 Thread KeithBJohnson
Same here, so I eliminated the choices for one that seemed more in line with what they were referencing. And *that* is proof that standardized multiple choice tests don't always measure intelligence. And as for racial factors: d'you think white folks would remember "grinding" as either working

[scifinoir2] Re: How much of a Geek are you?

2005-09-28 Thread g123curious
The video game question tripped me up. Back in the day, "grinding" didn't refer to a video game activity; there weren't any video games back in the 60's. "Grinding" referred to a style of slow-dancing we all loved and enjoyed. (Hahaha!) George --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTE