On 21 September 2016 at 22:13, Andreas Mueller wrote:
>
>
> On 09/19/2016 09:56 PM, Nelle Varoquaux wrote:
>>>
>>> Another bot-able tool might be pinging inactive PRs to ask if they're
>>> being
>>> worked on, and labelling "Needs contributor" if there's no reply within n
>>> days...!
>
> That kin
On 09/19/2016 09:56 PM, Nelle Varoquaux wrote:
Another bot-able tool might be pinging inactive PRs to ask if they're being
worked on, and labelling "Needs contributor" if there's no reply within n
days...!
That kind of only works when the status is "waiting for changes",
and not "waiting for r
Yeah the input format is a bit odd, usually it should be n_samples x
n_features, so something like
[['A'], ['C'], ['T'], ['G']]
Though this is currently also hard to do :(
On 09/20/2016 05:50 AM, Lee Zamparo wrote:
Hi Joel,
Yea, seems that the one-hot encoding of the transpose solves the
iss
Hi,
Thank you all for the info. It is not my first contribution to a project (I
made little contributions to xgboost and tensorflow), even though I think it is
really interesting what Oliver said, specially because of the very curated
structure and guidelines of the project. BTW, I’ve found su
If this is your first contribution to the project, I would strongly
suggest to start by contributing a small bug fix or improvement to get
accustomed to the kind of things the core devs expect when reviewing a
PR.
Also please read the contributors guide :
http://scikit-learn.org/dev/developers/co
