Re: [scikit-learn] ANN Scikit-learn 0.18 released

(this has been in drafts a few days and I'm sure there's plenty I've missed from the lists below) Well done, everyone! The size of this release - and the group of people that contributed to it - is even a bit overwhelming. Thanks for managing the release, Andy... and writing it up as a book! We'v

Re: [scikit-learn] Github project management tools

The spreadsheet seems to have some duplications and presumably some missing rows, with apologies. I assume some is due to the github pagination, and some may be my error. Not a big enough error to fix up. On 30 September 2016 at 05:15, Raphael C wrote: > My apologies I see it is in the spreadshe

Re: [scikit-learn] Question about Python's L2-Regularized Logistic Regression

That should totally depend on your dataset. Maybe it is an "easy" dataset and not much regularization is needed. Maybe use PCA(n_components=2) or an LDA transform to take a look at your data in 2D. Maybe they are easily linearly separable? Sklearn does not do any feature selection if you don't as

Re: [scikit-learn] Question about Python's L2-Regularized Logistic Regression

Hi, Kristen, there shouldn’t be any internal feature selection going on behind the scenes. You may want to compare the weight coefficients of your regularized vs unregularized model, if they are exactly the same, then this would be an indicator that something funny is going on. Otherwise, it cou

[scikit-learn] Question about Python's L2-Regularized Logistic Regression

Hi All, I am trying to understand Python’s code [function ‘_fit_liblinear' in https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/master/sklearn/svm/base.py] for fitting an L2-logistic regression for a ‘liblinear’ solver. More specifically, my [approximately balanced class] dataset is such that t

Re: [scikit-learn] ANN Scikit-learn 0.18 released

An important addition to the release notes that I forgot: The 0.18 release is the last scikit-learn release to support Python 2.6 From 0.19 on, we will only support 2.7 and 3.4 and up. On 09/28/2016 05:01 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote: Hi everybody. I'm happy to announce scikit-learn 0.18 has been

Re: [scikit-learn] Github project management tools

My apologies I see it is in the spreadsheet. It would be great to see this work finished for 0.19 if at all possible IMHO. Raphael On 29 September 2016 at 20:12, Raphael C wrote: > I hope this isn't out of place but I notice that > https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/4899 is not in

Re: [scikit-learn] Github project management tools

I hope this isn't out of place but I notice that https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/4899 is not in the list. It seems like a very worthwhile addition and the PR appears stalled at present. Raphael On 29 September 2016 at 15:05, Joel Nothman wrote: > I agree that being able to iden

Re: [scikit-learn] Github project management tools

On 29 September 2016 at 10:41, Nelson Liu wrote: > I think it's a matter of two things -- one, you can't be assigned if you > aren't a member of the organization on github. Two -- linking pull requests > to issues is generally visible enough (hence why it's in the PR template). > We don't have iss

Re: [scikit-learn] Github project management tools

I think it's a matter of two things -- one, you can't be assigned if you aren't a member of the organization on github. Two -- linking pull requests to issues is generally visible enough (hence why it's in the PR template). We don't have issues with figuring out who is working on an issue, but rath

Re: [scikit-learn] Github project management tools

I have a question which may/may not be relevant here. The question is why don't we assign issues to the one who have asked to take this issue. This feature may give us a better picture of the current stat of the Issue. We can ping that person directly and get info regarding his progress in case of

Re: [scikit-learn] PyData cook book

Yes, yes, yes I will take this Andreas. :) Regards Siddharth Gupta, Ph: 9871012292 Linkedin | Github | Codechef | Twitter | Facebook

Re: [scikit-learn] PyData cook book

This looks quite neat, open review seems to be a great way to do this sort of thing. I'd be interested in helping out if necessary. Nelson On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Andreas Mueller wrote: > Hey all. > Numfocus and some folks are working on a PyData cookbook: > https://github.com/pydata/p

[scikit-learn] PyData cook book

Hey all. Numfocus and some folks are working on a PyData cookbook: https://github.com/pydata/pydata-cookbook Unfortunately so far it has no scikit-learn yet. Is anyone interested in contributing? I think I did enough writing for a while ;) Andy Sent from phone. Please excuse spelling and brevity

Re: [scikit-learn] ANN Scikit-learn 0.18 released

> I want to participate in gsoc 2017 for scikit-learn projects. Can anyone > suggest any mentors to whom i can contact.? I would advise you to do a few PR that fix easy issues. That will get you to know the community. ___ scikit-learn mailing list scikit

Re: [scikit-learn] ANN Scikit-learn 0.18 released

Hi everybody, I want to participate in gsoc 2017 for scikit-learn projects. Can anyone suggest any mentors to whom i can contact.? Sent with Mailtrack On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:10

Re: [scikit-learn] ANN Scikit-learn 0.18 released

Thank you very much for the new version of this great SW! J. Dne 29.9.2016 15:55 napsal uživatel "Raghav R V" : Congrats everyone :) On 29 Sep 2016 9:41 a.m., "Jaques Grobler" wrote: > Congrats everyone! > > 2016-09-29 8:39 GMT+02:00 bthirion : > >> Congrats ! >> >> Bertrand >> >> >> On 29/09/

Re: [scikit-learn] Github project management tools

I've put a column for that status in. Note: this has largely been generated with https://gist.github.com/jnothman/8eba0834acfd633c6d83b437f6f18c49 On 30 September 2016 at 00:16, Guillaume Lemaître wrote: > What do you think about splitting MRG and MRG+1 in two different column. > The scrolling

Re: [scikit-learn] Github project management tools

What do you think about splitting MRG and MRG+1 in two different column. The scrolling can get a little bit less annoying and you can have an easier view on the MRG+1 to kick them out. ___ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.pyt

Re: [scikit-learn] Github project management tools

I agree that being able to identify which PRs are stalled on the contributor's part, which on reviewers' part, and since when, would be great. I'm not sure we've come up with a way that'll work though. In terms of backlog, I've wondered if just getting things into a spreadsheet would help: https:

Re: [scikit-learn] Github project management tools

So I made a project for 0.19: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/projects/5 The idea would be to drag and drop issues and PRs so that the important ones are at the top. We could also add an "important" column, currently the scrolling is pretty annoying. Thoughts? On 09/28/2016 03

Re: [scikit-learn] ANN Scikit-learn 0.18 released

Congrats everyone :) On 29 Sep 2016 9:41 a.m., "Jaques Grobler" wrote: > Congrats everyone! > > 2016-09-29 8:39 GMT+02:00 bthirion : > >> Congrats ! >> >> Bertrand >> >> >> On 29/09/2016 07:28, Gael Varoquaux wrote: >> >>> Hurray! >>> >>> Congratulations to everybody, and in particular the relea

Re: [scikit-learn] ANN Scikit-learn 0.18 released

Congrats everyone! 2016-09-29 8:39 GMT+02:00 bthirion : > Congrats ! > > Bertrand > > > On 29/09/2016 07:28, Gael Varoquaux wrote: > >> Hurray! >> >> Congratulations to everybody, and in particular the release time! >> >> Gaël >> >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 05:01:45PM -0400, Andreas Mueller wrote: