Re: [scikit-learn] ANN Scikit-learn 0.18 released

2016-09-30 Thread Andreas Mueller
On 09/29/2016 11:07 PM, Joel Nothman wrote: (this has been in drafts a few days and I'm sure there's plenty I've missed from the lists below) Well done, everyone! The size of this release - and the group of people that contributed to it - is even a bit overwhelming. Thanks for managing the

[scikit-learn] understanding lasso performance ?

2016-09-30 Thread Yoel Sanchez Araujo
Hi all, Today I updated to the latest release of scikit-learn, and I went to test out the LassoCV module in linear_model. I've tried both approaches below, and my accuracy seems very poor, while using the same exact data with glmnet in R for example will give me ~ 75% accuracy: from sklearn

Re: [scikit-learn] understanding lasso performance ?

2016-09-30 Thread Yoel Sanchez Araujo
Actually, just to follow up on this, I believe I see what's wrong. I've overlooked the fact that I'm attempting to compare classification from lasso in the R glmnet package to lassocv here, and the linear model that supports classification would be logistic regression in scikitlearn. Sorry!

Re: [scikit-learn] nmf with multiple cores

2016-09-30 Thread Tom DLT
Hi Roberto, As answered previously, there is no multi-threading available for NMF in scikit-learn. However, if you want to compute *multiple* NMF in parallel, you can use joblib with a threading backend, as the 'cd' solver releases the GIL (through cython code) during a large part of the time. Th

[scikit-learn] nmf with multiple cores

2016-09-30 Thread Roberto Pagliari
I’m running nmf on a machine with 16 cores. Is there an option to run nmf with multithreading? I know numpy does, but all I see is one single process with 100% CPU usage. Thanks, ___ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.pyt