To my understanding pandas.factorize only works for the static case where
no unseen variables can occur.
Georg Heiler schrieb am Mo. 7. Aug. 2017 um
08:40:
> I will need to look into factorize. Here is the result from profiling the
> transform method on a single new observation
> https://coderevi
I will need to look into factorize. Here is the result from profiling the
transform method on a single new observation
https://codereview.stackexchange.com/q/171622/132999
Best Georg
Sebastian Raschka schrieb am So. 6. Aug. 2017 um
20:39:
> > performance of prediction is pretty lame when there
> performance of prediction is pretty lame when there are around 100-150
> columns used as the input.
you are talking about computational performance when you are calling the
"transform" method? Have you done some profiling to find out where your bottle
neck (in the for loop) is? Just one a ver
@sebastian: thanks. Indeed, I am aware of this problem.
I developed something here:
https://gist.github.com/geoHeil/5caff5236b4850d673b2c9b0799dc2ce but
realized that the performance of prediction is pretty lame when there are
around 100-150 columns used as the input.
Do you have some ideas how to
