Re: [scikit-learn] Is scikit-learn implying neural nets are the best regressor?

;>             > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn > >>             > > >>             ___ > >>             scikit-learn mailing list > >> 

[scikit-learn] Is scikit-learn implying neural nets are the best regressor?

t;> > scikit-learn@python.org <mailto:scikit-learn@python.org> > >> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn > >> > > >> > >> ___ > >

[scikit-learn] scikit supervised learning order

;> (y_pred_lbfgs==y_pred_saga).all() == False > >> > > >> > > >> > ___ > >> > scikit-learn mailing list > >> > scikit-learn@python.org <mailto:scikit-learn@python.org> > >>

Re: [scikit-learn] logistic regression results are not stable between solvers

On 10/10/19 1:14 PM, Benoît Presles wrote: Thanks for your answers. On my real data, I do not have so many samples. I have a bit more than 200 samples in total and I also would like to get some results with unpenalized logisitic regression. What do you suggest? Should I switch to the lbfgs