Hello
I'm trying to change the entropy function which is used in sklearn for
DecisionTreeClassification locally on my system.
when I rerun the pip install --editable . command after updating the cython
file, I receive the following error message:
Error compiling Cython file:
Just for convenience:
Marquardt, Donald W., and Ronald D. Snee. "Ridge regression in practice." *The
> American Statistician* 29, no. 1 (1975): 3-20.
>
https://amstat.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00031305.1975.10479105
___
scikit-learn mailing list
s
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 9:43 PM wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 9:38 PM lampahome wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Stuart Reynolds 於 2020年1月9日 週四 上午10:33寫道：
>>
>>> Correlated features typically have the property that they are tending to
>>> be similarly predictive of the outcome.
>>>
>>> L1 and L2 are both
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 9:38 PM lampahome wrote:
>
>
> Stuart Reynolds 於 2020年1月9日 週四 上午10:33寫道：
>
>> Correlated features typically have the property that they are tending to
>> be similarly predictive of the outcome.
>>
>> L1 and L2 are both a preference for low coefficients.
>> If a coefficient
Stuart Reynolds 於 2020年1月9日 週四 上午10:33寫道：
> Correlated features typically have the property that they are tending to
> be similarly predictive of the outcome.
>
> L1 and L2 are both a preference for low coefficients.
> If a coefficient can be reduced yet another coefficient maintains similar
> lo
Correlated features typically have the property that they are tending to be
similarly predictive of the outcome.
L1 and L2 are both a preference for low coefficients.
If a coefficient can be reduced yet another coefficient maintains similar
loss, the these regularization methods prefer this soluti
I find out many blogs said that the l2 regularization solve
multicollinearity, but they don't said how it works.
I thought LASSO is able to select features by l1 regularization, maybe it
also can solve this.
Can anyone tell me how ridge works with multicollinearity great?
thx
___
Hi Ben.
Liblinear and l-bfgs might both converge but to different solutions,
given that the intercept is penalized.
There is also problems with ill-conditioned problems that are hard to
detect.
My impression of SAGA was that the convergence checks are too loose and
we should improve them.
Have
With lbfgs n_iter_ = 48, with saga n_iter_ = 326581, with liblinear
n_iter_ = 64.
On 08/01/2020 21:18, Guillaume Lemaître wrote:
We issue convergence warning. Can you check n_iter to be sure that you
did not convergence to the stated convergence?
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 20:53, Benoît Presles
We issue convergence warning. Can you check n_iter to be sure that you did
not convergence to the stated convergence?
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 20:53, Benoît Presles
wrote:
> Dear sklearn users,
>
> I still have some issues concerning logistic regression.
> I did compare on the same data (simulated
Dear sklearn users,
I still have some issues concerning logistic regression.
I did compare on the same data (simulated data) sklearn with three
different solvers (lbfgs, saga, liblinear) and statsmodels.
When everything goes well, I get the same results between lbfgs, saga,
liblinear and stat
11 matches
Mail list logo
