Wow… what?! That's insane…
scikit-image got some credits (
https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image-wheels/pull/47#issuecomment-736760539)
without much issue… Maybe someone should reach out directly on this thread
to the travis people?
Cheers,
N
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 11:37, Adrin wrote:
> I
n Plotting Contest Co-Chairs
Madicken Munk
Nelle Varoquaux
___
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
ion to the original author(s).
-
Past entries can be found at https://jhepc.github.io/
-
Questions regarding the contest can be sent to jhepc.organiz...@gmail.com
John Hunter Excellence in Plotting Contest Co-Chairs
Madicken Munk
Nelle
I think that's a good idea as well!
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 15:06, Chiara Marmo wrote:
> Be reassured Gael... no support via twitter... :)
> Just a way to centralize messages and reach people that ping to show that
> scikit-learn cares.
>
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 2:04 PM Gael Varoquaux <
> gael.va
Hadrien Mary
- Hamdi Sahloul
- Holly Gibbs
- Huang-Wei Chang
- i3v (i3v)
- Jarrod Millman
- Jirka Borovec
- Johan Jeppsson
- Johannes Schönberger
- Jon Crall
- Josh Warner
- Juan Nunez-Iglesias
- Kaligule (Kaligule)
- kczimm (kczimm)
- Lars Grueter
- Shachar Ben Harim
- Luis F. de Figueiredo
-
nter Excellence in Plotting Competition Co-Chairs
Hannah Aizenman
Thomas Caswell
Madicken Munk
Nelle Varoquaux
___
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
ll entries, whether
prize-winning or not, at the conference, use in any materials or on its
website, with attribution to the original author(s).
SciPy John Hunter Excellence in Plotting Competition Co-Chairs
Hannah Aizenman
Thomas Caswell
Madicken Munk
Nelle
+1
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 10:16, Roman Yurchak via scikit-learn <
scikit-learn@python.org> wrote:
> +1 as well
>
> Roman
>
> On 11/02/2019 09:47, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> > +1 on my side too.
> >
> > Thanks a lot Andy for moving this forward.
> >
> > Gaël
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 07:53:51AM
onference, use in any materials or on its
website, with attribution to the original author(s).
SciPy John Hunter Excellence in Plotting Competition Co-Chairs
Thomas Caswell
Michael Droettboom
Nelle Varoquaux
___
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-l
Dear all,
(apologies for the cross-posting)
The SciPy conference would like to invite you to submit proposals for Birds
of a Feather (BOF) sessions at this year's SciPy! BOFs usually include
short presentations by a panel and a moderator with the bulk of the time
spent opening up the discussion t
Hi everyone,
I thought some of you might be interested in this dead line extension.
Cheers,
N
-- Forwarded message --
From: Pierre de Buyl
Date: 26 June 2017 at 03:49
Subject: [SciPy-User] EuroSciPy 2017 call for contributions -
extension of deadline
To: scipy-u...@python.org,
Hello,
The concepts behind R and python are entirely different. Python is
meant to be as explicit as possible, and uses the concepts of
namespace which R doesn't.
While it can seem that python code is more verbose, it is very clear
when reading python code which functions come from which module an
Hi everyone,
I don't really think scikit-learn's documentation is lacking, but here is
an announcement for an event we are organizing called the "Docathon".
Several of us will be meeting up to sprint on documentation or
documentation-related projects at Berkeley, New York and Seattle.
If you are
> I'm fairly certain that the scikit-learn regression result, plus what you
> already have about the data is enough for you to compute all those
> statistical measures yourself. It should be rather trivial to do so.
>
That is highly dependent on the regression model you use. For example
computing
Hello,
This mailing list is dedicated to scikit-learn. For sparkit-learn
information, I suggest you contact directly the developers directly,
maybe by opening a ticket on their github project page:
https://github.com/lensacom/sparkit-learn
Thanks,
Nelle
On 9 December 2016 at 10:00, Debabrata Gho
On 3 December 2016 at 10:08, Andy wrote:
>
>
> On 12/03/2016 12:26 PM, Raghav R V wrote:
>>
>> We could start with assigning priority labels like they use in numpy...
>> That + milestones could help us prioritize?
>>
> I feel milestones are too coarse. Or I'm using them wrong.
> And priority label
I'm not sure
>> >> I'll
>> >> get around to making that feature :P)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 29 September 2016 at 23:45, Andreas Mueller
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> So I made a project for 0.19:
>> &g
Hello,
I personnally don't think it is useful and it clutters the UI with information.
I am actually trying to reduce matplotlib's number of labels right
now, as we have so many that they are useless.
Cheers,
N
On 30 October 2016 at 06:17, Raghav R V wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Should we have module l
On 13 October 2016 at 08:36, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> going to the mailing list
>
> On 10/13/2016 01:35 AM, Raghav R V wrote:
>
> Thanks for the messages {Ga|Jo}el. ;)
>
>> We can use "needs second review" as an alternative to "MRG+1" but I don't
>> see the point of using both.
>
> I see the syste
Congratulation Raghav!
On 3 October 2016 at 08:40, Ronnie Ghose wrote:
> congrats! :)
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:28 AM, lin yenchen
> wrote:
>>
>> Congrats, Raghav!
>>
>> Nelson Liu 於 2016年10月3日 週一 下午11:27寫道：
>>>
>>> Yay! Congrats, Raghav!
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Gael Varoqua
On 29 September 2016 at 10:41, Nelson Liu wrote:
> I think it's a matter of two things -- one, you can't be assigned if you
> aren't a member of the organization on github. Two -- linking pull requests
> to issues is generally visible enough (hence why it's in the PR template).
> We don't have iss
On 28 September 2016 at 12:24, Andreas Mueller wrote:
>
>
> On 09/28/2016 02:21 PM, Nelle Varoquaux wrote:
>>
>>
>> I think the only ones worth having are the ones that can be dealt with
>> automatically and the ones that will not be used frequently:
>>
&
t; is added automatically by a bot as
soon as a PR is opened. It tags PR that are WIP as needed review and
pretty much all of the PRs have it, as no one removes this tag. The
"need change" is used very sparsely because no one ever bothers to put
it (understand as "tagging is annoyi
On 28 September 2016 at 08:18, Andreas Mueller wrote:
>
>
> On 09/28/2016 10:05 AM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
>>
>> I am not against it. When I think about why I didn't use it, it was a
>> combination of laziness and lack of trust in git (ie I was worried of
>> hard-to-resolve conflicts).
>
> Cool.
>
On 21 September 2016 at 22:13, Andreas Mueller wrote:
>
>
> On 09/19/2016 09:56 PM, Nelle Varoquaux wrote:
>>>
>>> Another bot-able tool might be pinging inactive PRs to ask if they're
>>> being
>>> worked on, and labelling "Needs contribu
> Another bot-able tool might be pinging inactive PRs to ask if they're being
> worked on, and labelling "Needs contributor" if there's no reply within n
> days...!
If PRs are inactive, it might also be interesting to tag them as
easy_fix when there is little to do.
>
> On 20 September 2016 at 00
On 15 September 2016 at 14:41, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> Hi.
> Welcome Kathy and He.
>
> Gael:
> I talked with Kathy and committed to mentoring her and some of the other
> students a bit.
> Any help in reviews is obviously welcome tough ;)
>
> Kathy already worked on an easy issue and I think we'll
Thanks again for taking care of the release!
N
On 14 September 2016 at 16:26, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> Hi all.
> We just published the 0.18-rc2 release candidate on pipy and anaconda.org.
> Please go ahead and test it, so we can iron out the issues for the 0.18
> release.
> We plan to release in
I've submitted a ticket:
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/6921
with the small example Jonathan wrote up in the email.
Cheers,
N
On 22 June 2016 at 00:27, Gael Varoquaux
wrote:
> Looks like a bug indeed. Could you please put a small code snippet to
> enable us to reproduce.
>
29 matches
Mail list logo
