>>> We look forward to your response if you meet these requirements to
>>> proceed with the next steps.
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 10:17 AM Guillaume Lemaître <
>>> g.lemaitr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>
gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry I'm probably missing some detail but what does travis provide
>>>> that
>>>> github actions and azure pipeline don't provide?
>>>>
>>>> -- Original Message --
>>>> From:
dreasmuelle...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry I'm probably missing some detail but what does travis provide that
>>> github actions and azure pipeline don't provide?
>>>
>>> -- Original Message --
>>> From: "Gael Varoquaux
rovide?
>>
>> -- Original Message --
>> From: "Gael Varoquaux"
>> To: "Scikit-learn mailing list"
>> Sent: 11/26/2020 6:12:12 AM
>> Subject: Re: [scikit-learn] Changes in Travis billing
>>
>> >On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 03:
o: "Scikit-learn mailing list"
> Sent: 11/26/2020 6:12:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [scikit-learn] Changes in Travis billing
>
> >On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 03:06:52PM +0100, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 02:45:33PM +0100, Adrin wrote:
>
Sorry I'm probably missing some detail but what does travis provide that
github actions and azure pipeline don't provide?
-- Original Message --
From: "Gael Varoquaux"
To: "Scikit-learn mailing list"
Sent: 11/26/2020 6:12:12 AM
Subject: Re: [scikit-le
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 03:06:52PM +0100, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 02:45:33PM +0100, Adrin wrote:
> > At this point I'm at a loss, and reading the NumFocus chat and other
> > packages' experience with them on the same topic, seems like we just
> > need to move out of Travis.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 02:45:33PM +0100, Adrin wrote:
> At this point I'm at a loss, and reading the NumFocus chat and other
> packages' experience with them on the same topic, seems like we just
> need to move out of Travis.
Agreed. Do we still need them for something essential?
G
_
I tried contacting them a few times, but they don't really respond in any
meaningful way, or at all.
At this point I'm at a loss, and reading the NumFocus chat and other
packages' experience with
them on the same topic, seems like we just need to move out of Travis.
Cheers,
Adrin
On Thu, Nov 5,
> Shall I contact them? Any other volunteers?
+1.
I think we are still dependent on travis for ARM-based release builds
and cron-jobs. The rest we can move it to Azure Pipelines or github
actions I believe.
--
Olivier
___
scikit-learn mailing list
sci
I took this opportunity to migrate from travis-ci.org to
travis-ci.com. The project url is now:
https://travis-ci.com/github/scikit-learn/scikit-learn
The blog post did mention that we need to ask for a number of build
credits. Currently we use travis-ci to test the intel c compiler and
ARM. Look
Shall I contact them? Any other volunteers?
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 11:51 AM Gael Varoquaux <
gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote:
> Travis is changing it's billing strategy:
> https://blog.travis-ci.com/2020-11-02-travis-ci-new-billing
>
> Open repositories are getting a free initial set of cred
Travis is changing it's billing strategy:
https://blog.travis-ci.com/2020-11-02-travis-ci-new-billing
Open repositories are getting a free initial set of credit. They invite
open source projects to contact them to benefit from a more liberal
policy.
I suggest that we do the latter, as I fear that
13 matches
Mail list logo
