Re: [scikit-learn] Scikit-learn survey results

2017-03-06 Thread Tim Head
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 10:37 AM Andreas Mueller wrote: > Hi Brian. > > How about mondrian forests? ;) > Talk to Manoj (CCed) about those. He recently started an implementation while exploring them for scikit-optimize. T ___ scikit-learn mailing list s

Re: [scikit-learn] Scikit-learn survey results

2017-03-06 Thread Andreas Mueller
Hi Brian. How about mondrian forests? ;) And I think Gilles has thought about parallelizing trees a bit. It's definitely something that people are interested in. Andy On 03/06/2017 06:46 AM, Brian Holt wrote: Thanks Andy, That's really interesting and gives some hints for future direction.

Re: [scikit-learn] Scikit-learn survey results

2017-03-06 Thread Brian Holt
Thanks Andy, That's really interesting and gives some hints for future direction. As an initial suggestion, I wonder if incremental decision tree learning would be welcomed by the project? My personal experience building trees was very often frustrated by memory constraints and an alternative th

[scikit-learn] Scikit-learn survey results

2017-03-05 Thread Andreas Mueller
Hey all. In case you're interested, here is a summary view of the scikit-learn survey I posted recently: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-RHGZVZ73/ tldr; Preprocessing takes the most time, people want out-of-core learning, better integration with pandas and easier visualization of mode