Thanks for your answers.
DBSCAN has the correct doc because the fit_predict method is not
inherited, but it has its own implementation (because of the additional
parameter sample_weight).
I have forked the sklearn repo. I work in a virtualenv (virtualenv venv3
--no-site-packages --python python3.
+1 for a PR on fit_predict docs. This is probably due to the inheritance
structure.
Though it's weird that DBSCAN has the correct docs.
I'm not sure about renaming affinity, but we can discuss that. I agree
it's misleading.
On 5/23/18 8:01 AM, Tom DLT wrote:
Hi Anaël,
Thanks for spotting t
Hi Anaël,
Thanks for spotting these inconsistencies.
You are very welcome to open pull-requests and/or issues on the GitHub
tracker (cf.
http://scikit-learn.org/stable/developers/contributing.html#contributing-code
)
The documentation issue should be straightforward.
The parameter renaming would n
