Re: [Scikit-learn-general] introducing myself

2012-09-03 Thread Analytic Bastard
Thanks Andreas, My actual name is Javier, the name in the address is for anonymity purposes. Ich spreche trotz ein bisschen Deutsch. I am getting acquainted with the code and with the algorithms and then I will decide what to implement. Thanks for you warm welcome. 2012/9/3 Andreas Mueller >

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Userguide index on the website

2012-09-03 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 11:20:08PM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote: > Why do you think this is a good solution? Because it's easily discoverable. > The only reason to have everything there would be to be able to search > it imho. This is not how I saw it. I am worried that it may break the numberi

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Userguide index on the website

2012-09-03 Thread Andreas Mueller
On 09/03/2012 11:16 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 11:14:23PM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote: >> I mean what you see here: http://scikit-learn.org/dev/user_guide.html >> Which is the toc, I guess. >>> How do you suggest that we do that? >> :maxdepth: 3 >> on everything but the re

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Userguide index on the website

2012-09-03 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 11:14:23PM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote: > I mean what you see here: http://scikit-learn.org/dev/user_guide.html > Which is the toc, I guess. > > How do you suggest that we do that? > :maxdepth: 3 > on everything but the references. The solution that I would like to see is

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Userguide index on the website

2012-09-03 Thread Andreas Mueller
On 09/03/2012 10:59 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 09:55:41PM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote: >> I don't really like last minute decisions, but I just noticed something. >> What do you think about changing the index of the user guide to only go >> to a certain level? > What exact

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Userguide index on the website

2012-09-03 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 09:55:41PM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote: > I don't really like last minute decisions, but I just noticed something. > What do you think about changing the index of the user guide to only go > to a certain level? What exactly are you calling 'index': the toc, or the index?

[Scikit-learn-general] Userguide index on the website

2012-09-03 Thread Andreas Mueller
Hey everybody. I don't really like last minute decisions, but I just noticed something. What do you think about changing the index of the user guide to only go to a certain level? I thought about X.Y.Z. Now there are up to 5 levels (6 in the tutorial). Stuff that would go away is: 10x "pros" 10x "

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Loss documented in the GradientBoostedTrees

2012-09-03 Thread Gael Varoquaux
Hi Peter, Sorry for missing the PR: it was high on my list of things to review, but I hadn't gotten to it. Thanks, Gael -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security a

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] How to upgrade to development

2012-09-03 Thread Marcos Wolff
Thanks !! that's exactly what I need :D On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Olivier Grisel wrote: > 2012/9/2 Gael Varoquaux : > > Hi Marcos, > > > > Your problem is that your previous version of scikit-learn was installed > > using setuptools. Setuptools puts versions that it installs in front of > >

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] introducing myself

2012-09-03 Thread Andreas Mueller
Hey Albrecht. By the way, don't hesitate to ask questions at the issues if you are unsure on how to address them or how to choose one. Feedback on the issue-tracker is often near real-time. Cheers, Andy On 09/03/2012 02:09 AM, Analytic Bastard wrote: Thanks Olivier, I'll have a look at the URL

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Loss documented in the GradientBoostedTrees

2012-09-03 Thread Peter Prettenhofer
Hi Gael, the following PR contains better docstrings as well as some API consistency issues: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/1088 thanks, Peter 2012/9/3 Gael Varoquaux : > Hi tree growers, > > I was looking at the Gradient Boosted Tree docstring, and it seems to me > that the

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] introducing myself

2012-09-03 Thread Analytic Bastard
This test is purely non-parametric, it is based on the characteristic function evaluated at the data (OK basically their Fourier transform), following a characterization of independence by A. Renyi, though its actual implementation depends on pairwise distances and that is something I must understa

[Scikit-learn-general] Loss documented in the GradientBoostedTrees

2012-09-03 Thread Gael Varoquaux
Hi tree growers, I was looking at the Gradient Boosted Tree docstring, and it seems to me that the docstring for the 'loss' argument is incomplete: it only lists 'ls' and 'lad' as possible losses, and with a quick glance at the code, I have the feeling that there are more choices for the loss. Ga

[Scikit-learn-general] A sad day for our community. John Hunter: 1968-2012.

2012-09-03 Thread Fernando Perez
Dear friends and colleagues, I am terribly saddened to report that yesterday, August 28 2012 at 10am, John D. Hunter died from complications arising from cancer treatment at the University of Chicago hospital, after a brief but intense battle with this terrible illness. John is survived by his w

[Scikit-learn-general] Error when trying to initialize HMM transition probability matrix

2012-09-03 Thread Abiodun Iwayemi
Hello Everyone, I've used the Scikit-Learn Gaussian HMM module to learn the parameters and state transitions in a time series data set. I now wish to use the learned parameters (the transition probability matrix, mean and initial state probabilities) to initialize my HMM model and test it on ne

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Issue tags on github

2012-09-03 Thread Andreas Mueller
Any way, don't hesitate to retag, or better even, provide additional information on how to resolve the issue. Thinking about it, this particular issue is maybe not that easy ;) -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusiv

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Issue tags on github

2012-09-03 Thread Robert Layton
On 3 September 2012 17:11, wrote: > ** I agree, but for this specific issue, I thought that the consensus was > 'give a warning' and so now it should be fairly clear what to do. I tried > to avoid tagging issues as easy if high level knowledge was needed, maybe I > didn't succeed. > Andy > -- > D

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Issue tags on github

2012-09-03 Thread amueller
I agree, but for this specific issue, I thought that the consensus was 'give a warning' and so now it should be fairly clear what to do. I tried to avoid tagging issues as easy if high level knowledge was needed, maybe I didn't succeed. Andy -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltel