Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Release 0.14: tagged and pushed!

2013-08-08 Thread Lars Buitinck
2013/8/9 Mathieu Blondel : > This is not intentional. The question is why the reuters corpus was in the > source directory ? It should have been in ~/scikit_learn_data in the first > place. My guess is that the problem is in > https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/master/examples/applic

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Release 0.14: tagged and pushed!

2013-08-08 Thread Mathieu Blondel
Hi, This is not intentional. The question is why the reuters corpus was in the source directory ? It should have been in ~/scikit_learn_data in the first place. My guess is that the problem is in https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/master/examples/applications/plot_out_of_core_classi

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Release 0.14: tagged and pushed!

2013-08-08 Thread Tom Fawcett
Hi. Maybe this is a stupid observation, but release 0.14 is about 10 times the size of release 0.13. Looking through the directories, I see ./examples/applications/reuters contains the Reuters-21578 corpus (35 megs), both compressed and expanded. This looks like a mistake. Is this intentiona

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Release 0.14: tagged and pushed!

2013-08-08 Thread Frédéric Bastien
Hi, thanks to all who answered. using nosetests fixed all the tests error. Congratulation for the release. Frédéric On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote: > 2013/8/8 Gael Varoquaux : > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:36:51AM -0400, Frédéric Bastien wrote: > >> The way I run the t

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Release 0.14: tagged and pushed!

2013-08-08 Thread Nigel Legg
Well done to everyone who worked on this. I'll download and install tomorrow morning. Regards, Nigel Legg 07914 740972 http://www.trevanianlegg.co.uk http://twitter.com/nigellegg http://uk.linkedin.com/in/nigellegg On 8 August 2013 00:18, Gael Varoquaux wrote: > Hi Scikiters, > > I have tagge

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Release 0.14: tagged and pushed!

2013-08-08 Thread Olivier Grisel
2013/8/8 Gael Varoquaux : > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:36:51AM -0400, Frédéric Bastien wrote: >> The way I run the tests is to start python, import sklearn, then execute >> sklearn.test(). > > That not the right way to run the tests, and it hasn't been for a while. > You should do 'nosetests -x skl

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Release 0.14: tagged and pushed!

2013-08-08 Thread Olivier Grisel
2013/8/8 Nelle Varoquaux : > Hi Frédéric, > > This is not a good way to run the tests. Please, use nose to run the tests, > or type "make test" in the root folder of scikit-learn. This method only works to test the project buily from the source folder. It does not work if you install the officiall

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Release 0.14: tagged and pushed!

2013-08-08 Thread Nelle Varoquaux
Hi Frédéric, This is not a good way to run the tests. Please, use nose to run the tests, or type "make test" in the root folder of scikit-learn. Thanks, N On 8 August 2013 17:36, Frédéric Bastien wrote: > Hi, > > I just installed it and I have many tests errors. I also had the same sort > of

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Release 0.14: tagged and pushed!

2013-08-08 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:36:51AM -0400, Frédéric Bastien wrote: > The way I run the tests is to start python, import sklearn, then execute > sklearn.test(). That not the right way to run the tests, and it hasn't been for a while. You should do 'nosetests -x sklearn' from the command line. In add

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Release 0.14: tagged and pushed!

2013-08-08 Thread Frédéric Bastien
Hi, I just installed it and I have many tests errors. I also had the same sort of error with the 0.13 version. Here is a few example of the common error I got: == ERROR: Doctest: sklearn.tree.tree.DecisionTreeClassifier -

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Release 0.14: tagged and pushed!

2013-08-08 Thread Andreas Mueller
Hey everybody. Thanks a lot and congratulations to everybody who worked on this :) Cheers, Andy On 08/08/2013 01:18 AM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: > Hi Scikiters, > > I have tagged and pushed release 0.14. > > Vlad will build the Windows binaries tomorrow. In the mean time, the 0.14 > tarball is on

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] default params for precision_recall_fscore_support and precision_score

2013-08-08 Thread Joel Nothman
I gather there's a lot of historical default behaviour in those metrics. This results in a few quirks some of which are real problems, as in https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/2094. It should be cleaned up, but existing behaviour will need to be maintained for at least two releases

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Getting training score in multi-label classification problems

2013-08-08 Thread Joel Nothman
Btw, micro-average is trivial to implement (assuming I understand this correctly; I've not looked at the paper): def multilabel_pr_curve(y_true, y_scores): y_true = LabelBinarizer.fit_transform(y_true) return precision_recall_curve(y_true.ravel(), y_score.ravel()) Macro-average is tricki

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Release 0.14: tagged and pushed!

2013-08-08 Thread Bertrand Thirion
Congratulations ! Bertrand - Mail original - > De: "Gael Varoquaux" > À: scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net > Envoyé: Jeudi 8 Août 2013 01:18:09 > Objet: [Scikit-learn-general] Release 0.14: tagged and pushed! > > Hi Scikiters, > > I have tagged and pushed release 0.14. > > Vl

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Release 0.14: tagged and pushed!

2013-08-08 Thread Olivier Grisel
Thanks Gael for leading the final push on this release. The changelog is indeed very impressive. We can now focus on new stuff for 0.15 :) -- Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troub