About IPython notebook.
Is there way to work around relative imports in notebook? they doesn't seem
to work as absolute imports. but absolute imports are taken from the
installed package. I want to import from the version I'm working on.
-Maheshakya
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Kenneth C. Arn
First look indicates that it's mostly there. There are some formatting
issues that are consistent (code blocks are awful to read, images not being
properly wrapped, subsections not starting on a new page). My guess is that
once they are solved, most of the pdf will be right.
On 2 September 2013
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 10:37:24AM +1000, Robert Layton wrote:
> OK then, I'll build a copy this week and review it for errors.
Thanks Robert!
Gaël
--
Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more
OK then, I'll build a copy this week and review it for errors.
On 2 September 2013 04:32, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> On 09/01/2013 12:44 PM, Sean Violante wrote:
> > @robert layton
> >
> > Olivier gave the wrong command:
> >
> > it is
> >
> > make latex
> >
> > you then compile the latex with you
Although not all people use the package manager I expect that most of the
users of the package are going to use this method of installation, just for
simplicity. See, for reference, the results of this poll [1] about usage of
numpy and scipy: installation via MacPorts and Linux package managers
com
In addition to what everyone else has responded: you'd probably enjoy
working in an ipython notebook.
-Ken
On Aug 29, 2013 6:22 AM, "Maheshakya Wijewardena"
wrote:
> Hi
> I'm trying to implements a general Bagging module for Scikit-learn for an
> university project. I want to test the methods an
>
> And with that relative imports in the code like
> from ..base import ClassifierMixin, RegressorMixin
> from ..externals.joblib import Parallel, delayed, cpu_count
> I can't test manually what I've written.
I assume by that you mean you can't do `python path/to/module.py` on the
command-line.
On 08/29/2013 01:22 PM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> 2013/8/29 Maheshakya Wijewardena :
>> I've had a look at Gilles s previous pull request. My intention for now is
>> get an exposure to development on Scikit-learn, so that I can contribute
>> later with others. Thought this bagging would be a suitable
On 09/01/2013 12:44 PM, Sean Violante wrote:
> @robert layton
>
> Olivier gave the wrong command:
>
> it is
>
> make latex
>
> you then compile the latex with your favourite pdflatex compiler
>
> Personally, I wouldn't use the fact that no one downloads it as an
> indicator. It is just very hard t
@robert layton
Olivier gave the wrong command:
it is
make latex
you then compile the latex with your favourite pdflatex compiler
Personally, I wouldn't use the fact that no one downloads it as an
indicator. It is just very hard to find AND outdated on the website. My
understanding is that IF t
Dear Hector,
You probably want to introduce a loss function that quantifies the
accuracy of the solution and try to minimize it.
Then you will have to figure out how to perform some kind of
generalization to new samples. Are you learning a rule that associates a
with C_a ? Otherw
If I understand you correctly, you might be looking for SequenceKFold in
Lars Buitinck's seqlearn repository:
https://github.com/larsmans/seqlearn/blob/master/seqlearn/evaluation.py
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Hector wrote:
> Hey guys,
> I guess in the end this is a question about methodolo
12 matches
Mail list logo
