Hi Andy.
Thanks for the response :)
I'm looking into the project ideas but I'm am unable to zero in on a single
idea for GSoC . My knowledge is limited to linear and clustering models,
however I am willing to learn and read the literature well before GSoC and
I am a pretty quick learner. It would
Hey Manoj.
I agree that the description is vague.
I think what Vlad was trying to say that refurbishing only makes sense
if it comes with long-time support by an active user.
Basically, "refurbishing" means
- have a simple and sklearn-consistent interface
- be numerically stable, reliable and r
On 01/28/2014 01:44 PM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> 2014/1/28 Gael Varoquaux :
>>
>> I had never worried about that, and I guess nobody usually does. Do
>> people actually respect that clause in slides?
>>
>> Just put a tiny "BSD licensed" somewhere in the slide
Same here.
>
>> Practically, to relicens
On 01/29/2014 12:36 PM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> Maybe some organization has a Debian-based compute cluster with popcon
> installed and the sysadmin installed sklearn on all the nodes?
>
Not it!
On the other hand let me see where the default images lie around ;)
a hack that might be good enough could be to use as features the cos
and sin of the angle and split the output (using then multioutput
trees)
Alex
--
WatchGuard Dimension instantly turns raw network data into actionable
I think you're right, it might be quite a big of a hack... :-)
Anyway, if any of the main developers think it might be worth enabling this
kind of extensibility (handle different variables types) to the tree
implementation I'd be more than happy to contribute under limited
direction. Otherwise, I
Alright thanks for the clarification. In that case you will to hack a
lot indeed, good luck :)
--
WatchGuard Dimension instantly turns raw network data into actionable
security intelligence. It gives you real-time visual
Maybe some organization has a Debian-based compute cluster with popcon
installed and the sysadmin installed sklearn on all the nodes?
--
Olivier
--
WatchGuard Dimension instantly turns raw network data into actionable
s
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:07:28AM +, Nigel Legg wrote:
> Is the chart showing all installs, or just successful installs?
It's installed instances, and only for the Debian boxes that have popcon
enabled, so a minor fraction of them.
G
-
Is the chart showing all installs, or just successful installs? I was
reinstalling dependencies in vagrant yesterday and the statsmodels lib
install failed, which meant I had to start installing all dependencies
again - three times. Though this won't account for all the variation, if
other people
Thanks Gilles and Lars, I will try to figure out what is the best way to
hack the current implementation of the tree builder to combine different
splitters.
Olivier: What I want to implement is a tree that can combine both linear
and circular variables as input features and also the target variabl
I don't understand why, but it seems that our count of installation on
Debian has jumped crazily in the last weeks:
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=scikit-learn
Anybody has an explaination? Most likely some other package has declared
a dependency on us. It would be interesting to know whic
Just to clarify things Pablo: are your circular variables input
features or target regression variables in a multi-output regression
task?
--
Olivier
--
WatchGuard Dimension instantly turns raw network data into actionab
> I suppose, I will have to test all my variables at every node to find the
> optimum split measured with a criteria. What it's still not clear to me is
> if it exists an elegant way of choosing the right splitter depending on the
> variable, via tagging or any other solution.
Yes, we don't have a
Hi Gilles,
Thanks for your help, you're right, what I'm looking for is a new
implementation of a Splitter that deals with circular data.
I suppose, I will have to test all my variables at every node to find the
optimum split measured with a criteria. What it's still not clear to me is
if it exist
Hi Pablo,
I am not sure re-implementing a new criterion is what you are looking
for. Criteria are made to evaluate the goodness of a split (i.e., a
binary partition of the samples in the current node) in terms of
impurity with regards to the output variable - not the inputs.
What you should do in
2014-01-29 Pablo Rozas Larraondo :
> Suppose I want to create a regression tree accepting both continuous linear
> data and circular data. If I implement a new RegressionCriterion specific
> for circular data, how difficult would it be to grow a tree combining to
> different Criterions (ie MSE and
Suppose I want to create a regression tree accepting both continuous linear
data and circular data. If I implement a new RegressionCriterion specific
for circular data, how difficult would it be to grow a tree combining to
different Criterions (ie MSE and the new CircularCriterion)?
I suppose the
18 matches
Mail list logo