I skimmed through this survey:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.6709
For methods that learn a Mahalanobis distance, as Artem said, we can indeed
compute the Cholesky decomposition of the learned precision matrix and use
it to transform the data. Thus in this case metric learning can be seen as
supervised
>
> Are there any objections on Joel's variant of y? It serves my needs, but
> is quite different from what one can usually find in scikit-learn.
FWIW It'll require some changes to cross-validation routines.
On 22 March 2015 at 11:54, Artem wrote:
> Are there any objections on Joel's variant o
Are there any objections on Joel's variant of y? It serves my needs, but is
quite different from what one can usually find in scikit-learn.
--
Another point I want to bring up is metric-aware KMeans. Currently it works
with Euclidean distance only, which is not a problem for a Mahalanobis
dis
Hi,
Thanks for the offer.
Do you have benchmarks comparing the SPGL1 solver to scikit-learn's?
Do you know which class of algorithm the SPGL1 solver uses?
Cheers,
Gaël
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 09:49:01AM -0700, David Relyea wrote:
> Hi all,
> I recently ported the Matlab version of SPGL1 to p
Hi all,
I recently ported the Matlab version of SPGL1 to python. SPGL1 is an
extremely fast L1 solver (compressive sensing) that is fantastic with very
large datasets and also handles complex numbers naturally. It has
previously only been available in Matlab.
I'm a capable programmer and can refa
GSOC isn't the best way to get started. We recommend you get to know the
code structure, API and development process by starting with issues
labelled https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/labels/Easy. In
general, look through the Issue Tracker and find something of interest, or
which has sta
No , scikit-learn doesn’t have partial dependence plots for random forest.
Best regards,
Arnaud
> On 21 Mar 2015, at 03:43, Shubham Singh Tomar
> wrote:
>
> Does scikit-learn have any capacity for partial dependence plots and
> associated data arrays for random forest analyses?
> I can find t