Thanks, Andy.
Thank you all for accepting my proposal. Looking forward to working at my
best with Olivier, Loic! I would like also to congratulate other
participants Raghav
and Artem and wish best of luck.
I am finishing work and projects this semester, and will be back full-time
in these days.
> I thought that was discouraged and X.reshape(-1, 1) was suggested?
> (The newaxis makes it be neigher C nor F contiguous)
Indeed, sorry.
G
--
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
W
On 05/04/2015 07:47 AM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 01:32:02PM +0200, federico vaggi wrote:
>> I think Gael makes a very strong argument, but I think the error should be as
>> explicit and informative as possible (for new users).
> +1. Including suggesting the syntax X[:, np.new
(fwiw I think it's worse ;) : scalars are 1x1 matrices, i.e. 2d vectors in
matlab)
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 2:03 PM, federico vaggi
wrote:
> Yeah, especially coming from MATLAB, where there are so many weird special
> cases (scalars being 1 dimensional vectors, etc) to make it easy to use.
>
> On
Yeah, especially coming from MATLAB, where there are so many weird special
cases (scalars being 1 dimensional vectors, etc) to make it easy to use.
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Gael Varoquaux <
gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 01:32:02PM +0200, federico vaggi wro
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 01:32:02PM +0200, federico vaggi wrote:
> I think Gael makes a very strong argument, but I think the error should be as
> explicit and informative as possible (for new users).
+1. Including suggesting the syntax X[:, np.newaxis], which is not
trivial.
G
> On Fri, May 1, 2
I think Gael makes a very strong argument, but I think the error should be
as explicit and informative as possible (for new users).
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Gael Varoquaux <
gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote:
> I strongly advice raising an error. Very very very strongly.
>
> Being lax a
Dear Artem,
congratulations on the acceptance of your GSoC proposal! I am certain there
will be a very interesting summer ahead of us. Kyle and I are excited to be
mentors and will do our best to provide all the guidance necessary for your
project to succeed. It is very rich and will be a great ad
I am ok for raising an error by default when passing 1D arrays as X to
fit, predict and transform and allow for 1d array for the specific
cases where there is no ambiguity and the expected content of the
array is documented explicitly in the docstring (e.g. for feature
extractors such as text vecto
I am in favour of raising a error.
Arnaud
> On 01 May 2015, at 19:58, Gael Varoquaux
> wrote:
>
> I strongly advice raising an error. Very very very strongly.
>
> Being lax about ambiguous inputs makes prototyping and interactive usage
> easier: less typing, and the systems gets it right mos
10 matches
Mail list logo
