Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Release 0.12 schedule

2012-08-13 Thread Michael Waskom
ng good. Cheers, Michael On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Andreas Mueller wrote: > Hi Michael. > Actually that one is on my priority list. But my priority list is long ;) > Any help is always welcome. > > Andy > > > On 08/08/2012 07:41 PM, Michael Waskom wrote: > >

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Release 0.12 schedule

2012-08-08 Thread Michael Waskom
Hi, Do you think multinomial logit via SGD (GH849 https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/849) will make it into 0.12? This pull request seems to have stalled, but would be very nice to have! Best, Michael On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Gael Varoquaux < gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org>

[Scikit-learn-general] Comparing classifier confusion matrices

2012-04-16 Thread Michael Waskom
Hi all, I asked a question on metaoptimize about quantitative comparisons between classifier confusion matrices. If anyone has a good idea and would like to chime in, it would be much appreciated. http://metaoptimize.com/qa/questions/9936/good-methods-to-compare-classifier-confusion-matrices Tha

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Interpretation of LogisticRegression coefficients in multiclass case

2012-03-05 Thread Michael Waskom
ta can be dangerous when it comes to > "interpretation". > Basically I wouldn't do it if it's a plain logistic regression working > with voxel > based features. Now it depends on what you want to say and you might > find a way, eg. using permutations or bootstrap, to as

[Scikit-learn-general] Interpretation of LogisticRegression coefficients in multiclass case

2012-03-04 Thread Michael Waskom
Hi all, I have a LogisticRegression model I'm training in a 3-class scenario. I'd like to examine the coefficients for the models. As the default for LogisitcRegression is to do one-vs-all classification, my clf.coef_ array is shape 3 x nfeat. My question is how to interpret the sign of the coe

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Causes for one class dominating?

2012-01-31 Thread Michael Waskom
ned from the training set. But I think it's best to double-check with the experts. Also, if there's anything you would suggest I do from here to further elucidate the cause for the structure in bad_pca.png, I'd be happy to look into it. Best, Michael On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:3

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Causes for one class dominating?

2012-01-29 Thread Michael Waskom
this will yield a meaningful organization when pooling across > folds. You probably want to train the PCA on the whole dataset, or did I > miss something ? > > Bertrand > > On 01/29/2012 10:38 PM, Michael Waskom wrote: >> Aha, this does indeed suggest something strange: >

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Causes for one class dominating?

2012-01-29 Thread Michael Waskom
12 at 1:14 PM, Alexandre Gramfort wrote: > hum... > > final suggestion: I would try to visualize a 2D or 3D PCA to see if it > can give me some intuition on what's happening. > > Alex > > On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Michael Waskom wrote: >> Hi Alex, >>

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Causes for one class dominating?

2012-01-29 Thread Michael Waskom
ggestions: > > - do you observe the same behavior with SVC which uses a different > multiclass strategy? > - what do you see when you inspect results obtained with binary > predictions (keeping 2 classes at a time)? > > Alex > > On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Michael Wask

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Causes for one class dominating?

2012-01-29 Thread Michael Waskom
ect effect that > acts as a confound. > > again just a thought ready the email quickly > > Alex > > On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Michael Waskom wrote: >> Hi Yarick, thanks for chiming in! I thought about spamming the pymvpa >> list, but figured one at a time :) >

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Causes for one class dominating?

2012-01-28 Thread Michael Waskom
  100 >             TP           100      26 >             TN            26     100 >    Summary \ Means:     --  -- 100 100 37 37 0.79 0.79 0.63 0.63 0.21 > 0.39 0.41 >           CHI^2         123.04 p=1.7e-26 >            ACC           0.63 >            ACC%           63 >    

[Scikit-learn-general] Causes for one class dominating?

2012-01-28 Thread Michael Waskom
Hi Folks, I hope you don't mind a question that's a mix of general machine learning and scikit-learn. I'm happy to kick it over to metaoptimize, but I'm not 100% sure I'm doing everything "right" from a scikit-learn perspective so I thought it best to ask here first. I'm doing classification of f

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Searchlight algorithm with scikit-learn?

2011-10-05 Thread Michael Waskom
ve up, it looks like it will be quite nice when it's all polished! Michael On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Vincent Michel wrote: > Hi Michael, > > The code has been pushed. It still need some work, but you can > give it a try ! > > Best, > > Vincent > >

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Searchlight algorithm with scikit-learn?

2011-10-01 Thread Michael Waskom
ago...) and push it during > the weekend. > I will keep you inform. > > Best, > > Vincent > > > http://nipy.sourceforge.net/nipy/stable/index.html > > 2011/9/30 Michael Waskom > >> Hi all, >> >> I know that there are some other people out t

[Scikit-learn-general] Searchlight algorithm with scikit-learn?

2011-09-29 Thread Michael Waskom
Hi all, I know that there are some other people out there using scikit-learn for MVPA with neuroimaging data. Does anyone have an implementation of the searchlight method (i.e. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16537458) using scikit-learn that they would be willing to share? Michael --

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Announce: scikit-learn 0.9

2011-09-23 Thread Michael Waskom
Hi Folks, Just a note that in the install docs it directs you to use "sklearn" with pip/easy install: http://scikit-learn.sourceforge.net/stable/install.html#easy-install When, in fact, one should be searching for "scikit-learn." It doesn't work with sklearn. Otherwise, congrats on the release!