On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Satrajit Ghosh wrote:
> http://julialang.org/
This recent post by John Cook seems relevant:
"Math languages vs. application languages"
http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2012/04/02/why-scipy/
Alejandro.
yeap -- another example of such a "ideologically nice" new language is
(was) Fortress
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortress_%28programming_language%29 which I
was told in 2005 would rule the scientific world in a few years
;-)
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012, Mathieu Blondel wrote:
>Creating a new langua
Le 4 avril 2012 07:31, Mathieu Blondel a écrit :
> Creating a new language has its advantages (e.g., tailor the language to
> scientific computing) but the main disadvantage is that they need to
> recreate a complete ecosystem (plotting, interactive shell, ...). I wonder
> if we could get most of
Creating a new language has its advantages (e.g., tailor the language to
scientific computing) but the main disadvantage is that they need to
recreate a complete ecosystem (plotting, interactive shell, ...). I wonder
if we could get most of the advantages of julia in Python with Numba (
https://git
http://julialang.org/
cheers,
satra
--
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bou
