Maybe someone could add a link on sklearn web site to those 2 machine
learning QA site? This will help spread there usage.
Fred
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Martin Laprise wrote:
> Thanks all for you constructive comments,
>
> I think your right. In fact, it was also my impression that a QA
Thanks all for you constructive comments,
I think your right. In fact, it was also my impression that a QA dedicated
to sklearn is a little bit overkill, but I convinced myself that there is
never to much communication channels. That said, I think your right,
sklearn will have better visibility if
2012/2/14 Alexandre Passos :
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 17:30, Gael Varoquaux
> wrote:
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> Thanks for you enthousiasm, and thanks for the Crowdbase instance. The
>> Q&A sites are definitively very useful. I am myself an occasional user of
>> a few of them. Scikit-learn is actually v
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 17:30, Gael Varoquaux
wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thanks for you enthousiasm, and thanks for the Crowdbase instance. The
> Q&A sites are definitively very useful. I am myself an occasional user of
> a few of them. Scikit-learn is actually very well represented on the main
> Q&A
Hi Martin,
Thanks for you enthousiasm, and thanks for the Crowdbase instance. The
Q&A sites are definitively very useful. I am myself an occasional user of
a few of them. Scikit-learn is actually very well represented on the main
Q&A site for machine learn, http://metaoptimize.com/qa.
With regard
Hi All,
I read a lot of really interesting discussion on the sklearn mailinglist
lately. Unfortunately, it is hard to find specific answers in the archive,
so I started an new Crowdbase instance (a Q&A tool ... a little bit like
Stackoverflow) specifically for the sklearn developers and users. Fee
