On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 09:55:28AM -0700, Jake Vanderplas wrote:
> I did a bit more experimentation, and it looks like memoryviews with
> boundscheck and wraparound turned off are largely comparable to pointers
> for *pure indexing*. Slicing is what kills things.
Ha, that's useful information.
On 07/17/2012 09:20 AM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 09:01:28AM -0700, Jake Vanderplas wrote:
>> I put this together really quickly this morning - let me know if you see
>> anything I missed that makes the comparisons unfair.
> You're at scipy, aren't you? Maybe it would be usefu
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 09:01:28AM -0700, Jake Vanderplas wrote:
> I put this together really quickly this morning - let me know if you see
> anything I missed that makes the comparisons unfair.
You're at scipy, aren't you? Maybe it would be useful to grab some of the
cython folks to have their i
2012/7/17 Jake Vanderplas :
> On 07/16/2012 11:56 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
>> On 07/17/2012 07:40 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
>>> 2012/7/16 Andreas Mueller :
On 07/16/2012 09:55 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 01:13:55PM -0700, Jake Vanderplas wrote:
>> How do folks
seems like the pointer kung-fu pays off
Thanks Jake!
2012/7/17 Jake Vanderplas :
> On 07/16/2012 11:56 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
>> On 07/17/2012 07:40 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
>>> 2012/7/16 Andreas Mueller :
On 07/16/2012 09:55 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 01:13
On 07/16/2012 11:56 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> On 07/17/2012 07:40 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
>> 2012/7/16 Andreas Mueller :
>>> On 07/16/2012 09:55 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 01:13:55PM -0700, Jake Vanderplas wrote:
> How do folks feel about using this sort of blee
On 07/17/2012 07:40 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> 2012/7/16 Andreas Mueller :
>> On 07/16/2012 09:55 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 01:13:55PM -0700, Jake Vanderplas wrote:
How do folks feel about using this sort of bleeding-edge cython syntax
in scikit-learn?
>>> I w
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:40:31AM +0200, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> Still for new code I think it's better to use memoryviews rather than
> manual pointer manipulation that is prone to segfaulting.
I agree.
G
--
Live Secur
2012/7/16 Andreas Mueller :
> On 07/16/2012 09:55 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 01:13:55PM -0700, Jake Vanderplas wrote:
>>> How do folks feel about using this sort of bleeding-edge cython syntax
>>> in scikit-learn?
>> I wouldn't mind waiting another year: it's not like we d
On 07/16/2012 09:55 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 01:13:55PM -0700, Jake Vanderplas wrote:
>> How do folks feel about using this sort of bleeding-edge cython syntax
>> in scikit-learn?
> I wouldn't mind waiting another year: it's not like we don't have plenty
> of things to do
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 01:13:55PM -0700, Jake Vanderplas wrote:
> How do folks feel about using this sort of bleeding-edge cython syntax
> in scikit-learn?
I wouldn't mind waiting another year: it's not like we don't have plenty
of things to do, and there is no urgency.
That's my typical respon
Hello,
There has been some interesting discussion regarding cKDTree recently on
the scipy-dev list (see thread starting at
http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/2012-July/017737.html) and
I've been reading it with a lot of interest. Based on what Sturla is
saying within these messages, the
12 matches
Mail list logo
