On 10/29/2013 07:19 AM, jim vickroy wrote:
On 10/29/2013 5:11 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
2013/10/23 j vickroy:
On 10/23/2013 10:18 AM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
FYI, the features I would use for the superpixel based approach would be
"color" histogramms (bag of words of channel intensities):
Resha
On 10/29/2013 5:11 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
2013/10/23 j vickroy :
On 10/23/2013 10:18 AM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
FYI, the features I would use for the superpixel based approach would be
"color" histogramms (bag of words of channel intensities):
Reshape the images to (-1, 6) so you have lists
2013/10/23 j vickroy :
> On 10/23/2013 10:18 AM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
>> FYI, the features I would use for the superpixel based approach would be
>> "color" histogramms (bag of words of channel intensities):
>> Reshape the images to (-1, 6) so you have lists of pixels (subsample if
>> they are ma
On 10/23/2013 10:18 AM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> FYI, the features I would use for the superpixel based approach would be
> "color" histogramms (bag of words of channel intensities):
> Reshape the images to (-1, 6) so you have lists of pixels (subsample if
> they are many), run (MiniBatch)KMeans, a
Thanks Kyle! I'm certainly interested in any followup suggestions you may
have.
I probably could send a sample, labeled map. They are not publicly
available yet, but eventually they will be on a web site in near-real-time.
During our so-called "proving ground" phase, we are using NASA
SDO/AIA
FYI, the features I would use for the superpixel based approach would be
"color" histogramms (bag of words of channel intensities):
Reshape the images to (-1, 6) so you have lists of pixels (subsample if
they are many), run (MiniBatch)KMeans, and use the cluster-histograms as
features to describ
If differences in the labels correspond to borders in the image, then
you should try a superpixel base approach.
Run SLIC from skimage and see if you would be ok with labeling each of
the resulting superpixels with a single label (you may need to adjust
the number of superpixels produced
-- oh a
Other lists of techniques to look at:
Convolutional Neural Networks are another approach to image classification.
This goes outside the realm of sklearn, but has been used successfully on
some fairly complex data. For example, I have some code at
https://github.com/kastnerkyle/kaggle-cifar10 which
On 10/22/2013 9:30 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
I would also suggest the book "computer vision" by Richard Szeliski.
For you classification problem it really depends on what you want as
output and what the statistics of the data are.
If I understand you correctly, you want a prediction for each l
I would also suggest the book "computer vision" by Richard Szeliski.
For you classification problem it really depends on what you want as
output and what the statistics of the data are.
If I understand you correctly, you want a prediction for each label. If
your images are somewhat natural, the
On 10/22/2013 3:32 PM, Joseph Jacobs wrote:
The best book I have come across for image processing/vision + machine
learning is one by Simon Prince. You can download the book from his
website (http://computervisionmodels.com/). Chapter 13 gives a good
intro to feature extraction.
OK, great --
On 10/22/2013 3:32 PM, Joseph Jacobs wrote:
The best book I have come across for image processing/vision + machine
learning is one by Simon Prince. You can download the book from his
website (http://computervisionmodels.com/). Chapter 13 gives a good
intro to feature extraction.
Joe
On 22 Oc
The best book I have come across for image processing/vision + machine learning
is one by Simon Prince. You can download the book from his website
(http://computervisionmodels.com/). Chapter 13 gives a good intro to feature
extraction.
Joe
On 22 Oct 2013, at 22:27, jim vickroy wrote:
> On 10/
On 10/22/2013 2:47 PM, Joseph Jacobs wrote:
Hey Jim,
From my (non-expert) perspective, performing classification pixel-wise
would not be ideal (please correct me if I am wrong). I think the
better way would be to perform some sort of feature extraction on the
image (eg. SIFT, SURF, HOG, LBP a
Hey Jim,
From my (non-expert) perspective, performing classification pixel-wise would
not be ideal (please correct me if I am wrong). I think the better way would be
to perform some sort of feature extraction on the image (eg. SIFT, SURF, HOG,
LBP and many, many more...checkout scikit-image or
Hi,
Apologies if this is an inappropriate question for this forum.
I have a collection of (1024x1024) mono-chromatic images in which each
pixel is to be labeled as 1 of several categories (e.g., 10).
Furthermore, each mono-chromatic image was captured through several
filters (e.g., 5).
My
16 matches
Mail list logo