Announcement: scikit-image 0.12
===
The scikit-image team is very pleased to announce the release of version
0.12 of scikit-image.
scikit-image is an image processing toolbox for Python and SciPy, that
includes algorithms for segmentation, geometric transformations, co
Include an adoption notice in the deprecation warning?
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Gael Varoquaux <
gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org> wrote:
> Our poor homeless HMMs. Nobody wants them :)
>
> G
>
>
> --
> Rapidly troub
Our poor homeless HMMs. Nobody wants them :)
G
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
affects their revenue. Wi
On 11/30/2013 01:53 PM, Lars Buitinck wrote:
> 2013/11/30 Vlad Niculae :
>> seqlearn uses a different API on purpose though (one big ndarray),
>> whereas pystruct uses lists of arrays but is only focused on
>> max-margin learning :)
> And seqlearn only does supervised learning.
>
as does pystruct ;
2013/11/30 Vlad Niculae :
> seqlearn uses a different API on purpose though (one big ndarray),
> whereas pystruct uses lists of arrays but is only focused on
> max-margin learning :)
And seqlearn only does supervised learning.
--
seqlearn uses a different API on purpose though (one big ndarray),
whereas pystruct uses lists of arrays but is only focused on
max-margin learning :)
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Gael Varoquaux
wrote:
> +1 on the whole thread.
>
> I was hoping that Lars's seqlearn could be a home for poor H
+1 on the whole thread.
I was hoping that Lars's seqlearn could be a home for poor HMMs.
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have a clear picture of how applicat
> I guess remove means deprecate, right?
> I am +1 but we should definitely find a place for the code. Worse case
> it will be a repo with containing just the HMM.
My thoughts exactly; my impression is that people do find the code
useful and it's reasonably readable. It should definitely go into
On 11/30/2013 12:23 PM, Lars Buitinck wrote:
> 2013/11/30 Kyle Kastner :
>> Does anyone have a consolidated list of API issues with HMM? I have been
>> working with them recently and would be willing to try and work it into
>> better shape, unless core devs would rather have it removed.
> The API o
2013/11/30 Kyle Kastner :
> Does anyone have a consolidated list of API issues with HMM? I have been
> working with them recently and would be willing to try and work it into
> better shape, unless core devs would rather have it removed.
The API of the HMMs is fundamentally different from all othe
Does anyone have a consolidated list of API issues with HMM? I have been
working with them recently and would be willing to try and work it into
better shape, unless core devs would rather have it removed.
On Nov 26, 2013 8:29 AM, "Jaques Grobler" wrote:
> An awkward one to mention..
>
> But,
>
An awkward one to mention..
But,
What are the chances of removing HMMs for the next release.. Issues and PRs
still keep popping up as some users still want it.. but nobody is
maintaining it and as it's been said it doesn't really fit the API/scope..
2013/11/6 Nelle Varoquaux
> It'd be nice to
It'd be nice to merge #2199
Cheers,
N
On 6 November 2013 16:16, Peter Prettenhofer
wrote:
> Given that snow will arrive late I too should be able to get some stuff
> done as well.
>
> I want to get #2570 to MRG within one week so that we have plenty of
> time to review and tweak.
>
> Furthermo
Given that snow will arrive late I too should be able to get some stuff
done as well.
I want to get #2570 to MRG within one week so that we have plenty of time
to review and tweak.
Furthermore, I wanted to have a look a supporting different dtypes for SGD.
@Olivier: I will team up with you on r
2013/11/6 Olivier Grisel :
> I can help prepare the release by going through the open issues and
> pull requests on github and make a summary next week.
>
> All the three PRs highlighted by Gilles seem very important to me. I
> started reading the ESLII chapter on MARS soon to help with the review
I can help prepare the release by going through the open issues and
pull requests on github and make a summary next week.
All the three PRs highlighted by Gilles seem very important to me. I
started reading the ESLII chapter on MARS soon to help with the review
of the PR (I got interrupted by 2 co
Hi,
Thanks for pointing this Andy! I think it would help indeed to set some
coarse deadline for the next release. This would help us get motion and get
things done. End of december or beginning of January would be best for me.
On my side, I don't plan to contribute anything big in the meantime.
Hey everybody.
I just wanted to do my duty and point out that the next release should
be drawing closer.
I'll try to pitch in but I'm not sure how much time I'll actually find.
We are clearly not there at the the moment but I think we should start
to prioritize. I'd really
like the neural net
On 9 August 2013 13:08, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> On 08/09/2013 12:26 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> > On 08/09/2013 09:06 AM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> >> Can somebody from the dev team please upload a cleaned tarball? It is
> hard for me to do it right now. It is indeed quite a bummer to have such a
On 08/09/2013 12:26 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> On 08/09/2013 09:06 AM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
>> Can somebody from the dev team please upload a cleaned tarball? It is hard
>> for me to do it right now. It is indeed quite a bummer to have such a big
>> download.
>>
> Done for 0.14.1, will also do
On 08/09/2013 09:06 AM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> Can somebody from the dev team please upload a cleaned tarball? It is hard
> for me to do it right now. It is indeed quite a bummer to have such a big
> download.
>
Done for 0.14.1, will also do for 0.14 in a sec.
It is still 6mb, I think mostly due
Impressive change log !
Congratulations!!
Arnaud
--
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, w
Can somebody from the dev team please upload a cleaned tarball? It is hard for
me to do it right now. It is indeed quite a bummer to have such a big download.
Thanks,
Gael
- Original message -
> Hi,
>
> This is not intentional. The question is why the reuters corpus was in
> the source
2013/8/9 Mathieu Blondel :
> This is not intentional. The question is why the reuters corpus was in the
> source directory ? It should have been in ~/scikit_learn_data in the first
> place. My guess is that the problem is in
> https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/master/examples/applic
Hi,
This is not intentional. The question is why the reuters corpus was in the
source directory ? It should have been in ~/scikit_learn_data in the first
place. My guess is that the problem is in
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/master/examples/applications/plot_out_of_core_classi
Hi. Maybe this is a stupid observation, but release 0.14 is about 10 times the
size of release 0.13. Looking through the directories, I see
./examples/applications/reuters contains the Reuters-21578 corpus (35 megs),
both compressed and expanded. This looks like a mistake. Is this intentiona
Hi,
thanks to all who answered. using nosetests fixed all the tests error.
Congratulation for the release.
Frédéric
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> 2013/8/8 Gael Varoquaux :
> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:36:51AM -0400, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
> >> The way I run the t
Well done to everyone who worked on this.
I'll download and install tomorrow morning.
Regards,
Nigel Legg
07914 740972
http://www.trevanianlegg.co.uk
http://twitter.com/nigellegg
http://uk.linkedin.com/in/nigellegg
On 8 August 2013 00:18, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> Hi Scikiters,
>
> I have tagge
2013/8/8 Gael Varoquaux :
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:36:51AM -0400, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
>> The way I run the tests is to start python, import sklearn, then execute
>> sklearn.test().
>
> That not the right way to run the tests, and it hasn't been for a while.
> You should do 'nosetests -x skl
2013/8/8 Nelle Varoquaux :
> Hi Frédéric,
>
> This is not a good way to run the tests. Please, use nose to run the tests,
> or type "make test" in the root folder of scikit-learn.
This method only works to test the project buily from the source
folder. It does not work if you install the officiall
Hi Frédéric,
This is not a good way to run the tests. Please, use nose to run the tests,
or type "make test" in the root folder of scikit-learn.
Thanks,
N
On 8 August 2013 17:36, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just installed it and I have many tests errors. I also had the same sort
> of
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:36:51AM -0400, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
> The way I run the tests is to start python, import sklearn, then execute
> sklearn.test().
That not the right way to run the tests, and it hasn't been for a while.
You should do 'nosetests -x sklearn' from the command line. In add
Hi,
I just installed it and I have many tests errors. I also had the same sort
of error with the 0.13 version. Here is a few example of the common error I
got:
==
ERROR: Doctest: sklearn.tree.tree.DecisionTreeClassifier
-
Hey everybody.
Thanks a lot and congratulations to everybody who worked on this :)
Cheers,
Andy
On 08/08/2013 01:18 AM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> Hi Scikiters,
>
> I have tagged and pushed release 0.14.
>
> Vlad will build the Windows binaries tomorrow. In the mean time, the 0.14
> tarball is on
Congratulations !
Bertrand
- Mail original -
> De: "Gael Varoquaux"
> À: scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net
> Envoyé: Jeudi 8 Août 2013 01:18:09
> Objet: [Scikit-learn-general] Release 0.14: tagged and pushed!
>
> Hi Scikiters,
>
> I h
Thanks Gael for leading the final push on this release. The changelog is
indeed very impressive.
We can now focus on new stuff for 0.15 :)
--
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troub
Great!
Thank you all for the hard work. The changelog is really impressive :)
Gilles
On 8 August 2013 01:18, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> Hi Scikiters,
>
> I have tagged and pushed release 0.14.
>
> Vlad will build the Windows binaries tomorrow. In the mean time, the 0.14
> tarball is on pypi, but
Hi Scikiters,
I have tagged and pushed release 0.14.
Vlad will build the Windows binaries tomorrow. In the mean time, the 0.14
tarball is on pypi, but I have not hidden the old files for the 0.13.
The new website is live! Congratulations everybody who worked on it.
The master branch and the de
Since I think the issue 1476 is very subtle and need to be fixed, I would
like to also post my finding about this issue here.
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/1476
However, I don't have a solution now :( .
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> Hi everybody
Hi everybody.
Those of you who watch the issue tracker might have noticed that we (I)
am a bit behind on schedule for the next
release, 0.13. I'd really like to release quite soon as a lot of things
accumulated already.
I would really like to branch for the release Monday next week, i.e. on
On 11/14/2012 03:27 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
Am 14.11.2012 15:09, schrieb Olivier Grisel:
>> I would really like to finish my work on the shared memory improvement
>> in joblib. It's almost ready as numpy master has resolved the semantic
>> change that caused the delay.
>>
>> https://github.c
Am 15.11.2012 10:34, schrieb Mathieu Blondel:
> Tackling this one would be nice:
> https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/1327
>
> Currently, PassiveAggressiveClassifier is quite slower than Perceptron.
>
There is a list of issues tagged with the 0.13 milestone:
https://github.com/scik
Tackling this one would be nice:
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/1327
Currently, PassiveAggressiveClassifier is quite slower than Perceptron.
Mathieu
--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrast
2012/11/14 Andreas Mueller :
>> I'd like to move isotonic regression out of linear model
>>
> +1
+1
--
Lars Buitinck
Scientific programmer, ILPS
University of Amsterdam
--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infras
> What!?
>
> Why ?
>
> We discussed this, and when fabian and I raised the concern that this was
> not the correct place to put it, you insisted it was.
well let's say you finally convinced me ;-)
Alex
--
Monitor your ph
On 14 November 2012 17:15, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> Am 14.11.2012 17:13, schrieb Alexandre Gramfort:
> > hi,
> >
> > I'd like to move isotonic regression out of linear model
> >
> > A
>
What!?
Why ?
We discussed this, and when fabian and I raised the concern that this was
not the correct place
On Nov 14, 2012, at 14:09 , Olivier Grisel wrote:
>
>
> I would have also liked to implement a hashing text vectorizer but I
> am not sure I will find the time to do this week or the next week.
I'd love to help with that next week!
--
Vlad N.
http://vene.ro
---
Am 14.11.2012 17:13, schrieb Alexandre Gramfort:
> hi,
>
> I'd like to move isotonic regression out of linear model
>
> A
>
+1
--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-de
hi,
I'd like to move isotonic regression out of linear model
A
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Andreas Mueller
wrote:
> Am 14.11.2012 15:09, schrieb Olivier Grisel:
>> I would really like to finish my work on the shared memory improvement
>> in joblib. It's almost ready as numpy master has res
Am 14.11.2012 15:09, schrieb Olivier Grisel:
> I would really like to finish my work on the shared memory improvement
> in joblib. It's almost ready as numpy master has resolved the semantic
> change that caused the delay.
>
> https://github.com/joblib/joblib/pull/44
>
> I would have also liked to
2012/11/14 Andreas Mueller :
> Lars just expressed some surprise that it is already time again.
It's just that I really want the hashing vectorizer in the next
release, but I don't know if I can manage that in the next 3 weeks.
--
Lars Buitinck
Scientific programmer, ILPS
University of Amsterdam
I would really like to finish my work on the shared memory improvement
in joblib. It's almost ready as numpy master has resolved the semantic
change that caused the delay.
https://github.com/joblib/joblib/pull/44
I would have also liked to implement a hashing text vectorizer but I
am not sure I w
Hi everybody.
If we take our usual 3 monthly schedule, the 0.13 will be released in
about 2-3 weeks.
Lars just expressed some surprise that it is already time again.
Should we move this backwards because of the bugfix release a month ago?
I had the impression that already quite some things got me
Another useful contrib / check to do before the relase is to review
that all the recently merged pull request have been documented in the
whats_new.rst file, especially if it incurs some public API change.
--
Olivier
--
+1 but we should adhere to the rule of waiting at least two releases. And
deprecation warnings on renamed parameters never produce spurious warnings.
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
Gael Varoquaux schrieb:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 03:50:15PM +03
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 03:50:15PM +0300, Vlad Niculae wrote:
> I think we should go through them thoroughly before the release. I could
> volunteer for this.
Sounds very useful. Thanks a lot for volunteering.
Gaël
--
L
On Aug 31, 2012, at 18:27 , amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.de wrote:
> We do? Which warnings do you mean? I am not aware of any warnings in the
> tests or examples.
Sorry, I exaggerated because I was looking at the latest release instead. The
test suite is clean, but the codebase still has some leftove
We do? Which warnings do you mean? I am not aware of any warnings in the tests
or examples.
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
Vlad Niculae schrieb:
We are all annoyed by warnings; we have a ton of them at the moment. Some of
them are scheduled f
Sure, no problem.
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
Peter Prettenhofer schrieb:
Hi all,
unfortunately, I'm not available on Saturday and Sunday - if possible,
it would be great if we could post-pone the release until Tuesday.
thanks,
Peter
2012
Hi all,
unfortunately, I'm not available on Saturday and Sunday - if possible,
it would be great if we could post-pone the release until Tuesday.
thanks,
Peter
2012/8/31 Vlad Niculae :
> We are all annoyed by warnings; we have a ton of them at the moment. Some of
> them are scheduled for remov
We are all annoyed by warnings; we have a ton of them at the moment. Some of
them are scheduled for removal, and others have even passed their deadline.
I think we should go through them thoroughly before the release. I could
volunteer for this.
Best,
Vlad
--
Vlad N.
http://ven
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 06:39:23PM +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> My plan at the moment is to release after the weekend.
Good with me. I have had troubles following lately, so I completely defer
my judgement to you. Also, I won't be able to help much, as I am going to
be in between travels, tryin
Hi everybody.
My plan at the moment is to release after the weekend.
I hope that is ok for everybody. I'll be a bit busy tomorrow
but I'll be online on Saturday and Sunday.
Thanks for everybody for their help in tackling the issues and
all the other great contributions.
I think we are in pretty goo
Hi Michael.
Thanks for getting back.
As I just started working on a kaggle submission, I implemented some new
features and bugfixes for that
and I'll probably be working on those in the next couple of days.
So get your hopes up to much.
I think the new submission system somehow lets you subscri
Hi Andreas,
I doubt I could be of great use on the algorithm itself, but I'm happy to
help out with example(s) when it's up and running. I'll keep an eye on the
PR (Is there a way to "watch" a specific issue on github?), or feel free to
ping me when the tests are looking good.
Cheers,
Michael
O
Hi Michael.
Actually that one is on my priority list. But my priority list is long ;)
Any help is always welcome.
Andy
On 08/08/2012 07:41 PM, Michael Waskom wrote:
Hi,
Do you think multinomial logit via SGD (GH849
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/849) will make it
into 0.12
Hi,
Do you think multinomial logit via SGD (GH849
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/849) will make it into
0.12? This pull request seems to have stalled, but would be very nice to
have!
Best,
Michael
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Gael Varoquaux <
gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org>
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 02:35:29PM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote:
> Soon it is time for a new release. I notices some people are going on holiday
> (I think Lars and Gilles),
> so maybe it would be good for wait them to be back.
> Therefore I'd suggest releasing at the end of August.
> Any opinions?
>
> In mid-september there will be a scikit-learn sprint in Paris:
> http://www.pycon.fr/2012/ but we don't need to wait for that sprint
> to
> make a new release.
>
I think releasing before that makes more sense. Usually sprints
create lots of PRs that need to be reviewed.
> I don't want to p
fine with me. I'd personally be happy to have :
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/947 (group lasso)
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/899 (multi task lasso)
finished and merged before the release.
just putting a bit of pressure on fabian and me :)
Alex
On Wed,
2012/8/1 Charanpal Dhanjal :
> Hi Giles,
> Just a note to say that I wrote some code to do CART pruning on sklearn
> trees, and would be happy to send that along. Is that useful to you? The
> only problem is that the code is rather messy, but I can spend some time
> cleaning it up.
There is alread
Hi Giles,
Just a note to say that I wrote some code to do CART pruning on sklearn
trees, and would be happy to send that along. Is that useful to you? The
only problem is that the code is rather messy, but I can spend some time
cleaning it up.
Best wishes,
Charanpal
On 01/08/12 14:46, Gilles Lo
2012/8/1 Andreas Müller :
> Hey Everybody.
> Soon it is time for a new release. I notices some people are going on holiday
> (I think Lars and Gilles),
> so maybe it would be good for wait them to be back.
I will be off the next 2 weeks. The weekend after that I will attend
EuroScipy in Brussels
Hi,
I am indeed leaving for holiday very soon and will be disconnected
until mid-Augustus.
My personal wish list is short:
- #986: A full lazy argsort implementation of the tree construction algorithm.
- #941: Tree post-pruning
I plan to work on both at my return. #941 shouldn't take much time,
Hey Everybody.
Soon it is time for a new release. I notices some people are going on holiday
(I think Lars and Gilles),
so maybe it would be good for wait them to be back.
Therefore I'd suggest releasing at the end of August.
Any opinions?
My wish list looks like this (from more realistic to less
So far the only person who can do it is Fabian because the rights of the files
on the sourceforge account are screwed up.
We will do that after the release, as the final changelog needs to be out.
I'll be back in front of a computer in an hour.
Gael
- Original message -
> Hi everybody.
Hi everybody.
I was wondering how to update the "stable" website.
I think now (maybe a small windows testing comment) would
be a good time to do so.
Can I do that or does someone else have to do it?
Cheers,
Andy
--
Live
If you have any thing that you particularly
want for the next release, let me know.
In the process, could you document how to make a release? (like a
check list for example) That could be useful!
I think Fabian already did a pretty good job documenting how to do a
release.
If I fe
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Andreas Mueller
wrote:
> Hey Everybody.
> A little update on the release schedule:
> I plan to do the release next Monday,
> on the 23rd.
>
>
Cool, I didn't know that you are the new release manager :)
> If you have any thing that you particularly
> want for th
Hey Everybody.
A little update on the release schedule:
I plan to do the release next Monday,
on the 23rd.
If you have any thing that you particularly
want for the next release, let me know.
Cheers,
Andy
--
For Developer
80 matches
Mail list logo
