On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 11:20:08PM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> Why do you think this is a good solution?
Because it's easily discoverable.
> The only reason to have everything there would be to be able to search
> it imho.
This is not how I saw it. I am worried that it may break the numberi
On 09/03/2012 11:16 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 11:14:23PM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote:
>> I mean what you see here: http://scikit-learn.org/dev/user_guide.html
>> Which is the toc, I guess.
>>> How do you suggest that we do that?
>> :maxdepth: 3
>> on everything but the re
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 11:14:23PM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> I mean what you see here: http://scikit-learn.org/dev/user_guide.html
> Which is the toc, I guess.
> > How do you suggest that we do that?
> :maxdepth: 3
> on everything but the references.
The solution that I would like to see is
On 09/03/2012 10:59 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 09:55:41PM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote:
>> I don't really like last minute decisions, but I just noticed something.
>> What do you think about changing the index of the user guide to only go
>> to a certain level?
> What exact
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 09:55:41PM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> I don't really like last minute decisions, but I just noticed something.
> What do you think about changing the index of the user guide to only go
> to a certain level?
What exactly are you calling 'index': the toc, or the index?
Hey everybody.
I don't really like last minute decisions, but I just noticed something.
What do you think about changing the index of the user guide to only go
to a certain level?
I thought about X.Y.Z. Now there are up to 5 levels (6 in the tutorial).
Stuff that would go away is:
10x "pros"
10x "
