On 10/31/2015 01:41 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
>
> Why didn't you use "git revert" rather than rewriting history?
>
> Thanks for working on the release, by the way!
>
I didn't think it mattered for a branch no-one was using, and it is
already a bit hard to keep track of what is happening in the rel
Why didn't you use "git revert" rather than rewriting history?
Thanks for working on the release, by the way!
Gaël
Sent from my phone. Please forgive brevity and mis spelling
On Oct 31, 2015, 17:10, at 17:10, Andy wrote:
>Hey.
>Just in case anyone was working on 0.17.X for some reason:
>I ne
Hey.
Just in case anyone was working on 0.17.X for some reason:
I needed to remove a commit that was accidentally cherrypicked.
So if you have a 0.17.X branch you need to update it to the rebased master:
git fetch uptream && git checkout 0.17.X && git reset --hard upstream/0.17.X
Cheers,
Andy
-
