steve donovan:
replace line 166 (which is just #define LUA_API extern)
That looks like line 164 to me. Committed.
Neil
___
Scite-interest mailing list
Scite-interest@lyra.org
http://mailman.lyra.org/mailman/listinfo/scite-interest
On 7/12/07, Neil Hodgson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The code move from Scintilla to SciTE has now been committed and
is available from CVS and from
http://scintilla.sourceforge.net/scite.zip Source
http://scintilla.sourceforge.net/wscite.zip Windows executable
Thanks, Neil.
I see we have
The code move from Scintilla to SciTE has now been committed and
is available from CVS and from
http://scintilla.sourceforge.net/scite.zip Source
http://scintilla.sourceforge.net/wscite.zip Windows executable
Neil
___
Scite-interest mailing list
Sc
Shane Caraveo:
Would this change the functionality provided by setkeywords, and the
set/get property methods? That is the basic level we use in Komodo.
This does not change the main Scintilla SCI_* interface and will
only be an issue for applications that link directly to Scintilla's
PropSe
Would this change the functionality provided by setkeywords, and the
set/get property methods? That is the basic level we use in Komodo.
Shane
Neil Hodgson wrote:
Bug #1749659 bought up again some modularity problems with
Scintilla/SciTE. The WordList and PropSet classes are defined in
Scint