Re: [scite] Re: [scintilla] Moving some WordList and PropSet functionality from Scintilla to SciTE

2007-07-14 Thread Neil Hodgson
steve donovan: replace line 166 (which is just #define LUA_API extern) That looks like line 164 to me. Committed. Neil ___ Scite-interest mailing list Scite-interest@lyra.org http://mailman.lyra.org/mailman/listinfo/scite-interest

Re: [scite] Re: [scintilla] Moving some WordList and PropSet functionality from Scintilla to SciTE

2007-07-13 Thread steve donovan
On 7/12/07, Neil Hodgson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The code move from Scintilla to SciTE has now been committed and is available from CVS and from http://scintilla.sourceforge.net/scite.zip Source http://scintilla.sourceforge.net/wscite.zip Windows executable Thanks, Neil. I see we have

[scite] Re: [scintilla] Moving some WordList and PropSet functionality from Scintilla to SciTE

2007-07-12 Thread Neil Hodgson
The code move from Scintilla to SciTE has now been committed and is available from CVS and from http://scintilla.sourceforge.net/scite.zip Source http://scintilla.sourceforge.net/wscite.zip Windows executable Neil ___ Scite-interest mailing list Sc

[scite] Re: [scintilla] Moving some WordList and PropSet functionality from Scintilla to SciTE

2007-07-09 Thread Neil Hodgson
Shane Caraveo: Would this change the functionality provided by setkeywords, and the set/get property methods? That is the basic level we use in Komodo. This does not change the main Scintilla SCI_* interface and will only be an issue for applications that link directly to Scintilla's PropSe

[scite] Re: [scintilla] Moving some WordList and PropSet functionality from Scintilla to SciTE

2007-07-09 Thread Shane Caraveo
Would this change the functionality provided by setkeywords, and the set/get property methods? That is the basic level we use in Komodo. Shane Neil Hodgson wrote: Bug #1749659 bought up again some modularity problems with Scintilla/SciTE. The WordList and PropSet classes are defined in Scint