On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
> This is basically a kick-off for getting more feedback for an idea shared at
> http://www.themindiseverything.eu/2017/03/software-collections-daemons-made.html.
>
> Shortly, SCL has worked nicely for several years and people love them. But
> ev
I will chime in as the "old curmudgeon" - as long as you don't break the
existing use case, then I'm fine with any changes. The blog post says
subpackages will be used to ensure no breakage - I just want to re-iterate that
this is important and should not get lost if the proposal changes.
Thank
On 03/21/2017 06:04 PM, Vacelet, Manuel wrote:
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Honza Horak mailto:hho...@redhat.com>> wrote:
This is basically a kick-off for getting more feedback for an idea
shared at
http://www.themindiseverything.eu/2017/03/software-collections-daemons-made.html
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
> This is basically a kick-off for getting more feedback for an idea shared
> at http://www.themindiseverything.eu/2017/03/software-
> collections-daemons-made.html.
>
> Shortly, SCL has worked nicely for several years and people love them. But
This is basically a kick-off for getting more feedback for an idea
shared at
http://www.themindiseverything.eu/2017/03/software-collections-daemons-made.html.
Shortly, SCL has worked nicely for several years and people love them.
But even the beloved ones have some issues. And what we hear fro
