Re: [scl.org] rh-python36-build alternative in rhel

2017-11-28 Thread Jiri Novak
Hi, according to this ( https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2014/12/04/add-packages-to-python-2-7-software-collection/ ), I'm trying to create my own extension of the rh-python36, though doesn't build: + '[' '%{buildarch}' = noarch ']' + QA_CHECK_RPATHS=1 + case "${QA_CHECK_RPATHS:-}" in + /usr/li

Re: [scl.org] rh-python36-build alternative in rhel

2017-11-28 Thread Stefan Ring
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Jiri Novak wrote: > Hi, > > according to this ( > https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2014/12/04/add-packages-to-python-2-7-software-collection/ > ), I'm trying to create my own extension of the rh-python36, though > doesn't build: > > + '[' '%{buildarch}' = noarch

Re: [scl.org] rh-python36-build alternative in rhel

2017-11-28 Thread Jiri Novak
Hi I need to add more libraries to rh-python36, which would require using rh-python36-build package and I've been told it is wring and I should do my own SCL. then I need to make the application use the extended SCL with added libraries. Just running it agains rh-python36 is not enough because o

Re: [scl.org] rh-python36-build alternative in rhel

2017-11-28 Thread Jiri Novak
Hi, pip is not preffered way for production deployments here. I'll keep it as last resort (maybe even after adding the libraries into rh-python36 collection which is bad :)) But generally, if I want to create a dependent SCL, I obviously miss some macros or something in the specfile. thanks, Gh.

Re: [scl.org] rh-python36-build alternative in rhel

2017-11-28 Thread Stefan Ring
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Jiri Novak wrote: > Hi > > I need to add more libraries to rh-python36, which would require using > rh-python36-build package and I've been told it is wring and I should do > my own SCL. > > then I need to make the application use the extended SCL with added > libr