Stefan Ring wrote:
>> What else is the right way to make RPM adding more libraries available
>> when in scl enable rh-python36 bash?
> Create your own mirror of rh-python36 and just add your packages to it?
Sounds like dirty hack as rh-python36-build was intentionally not
shipped in rhel. or by
Stefan Ring wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Jiri Novak <jiri.no...@ghorland.net> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I need to add more libraries to rh-python36, which would require using
>> rh-python36-build package and I've been told it is wring and I should do
>>
of missing
dependencies :(
The specfile should create packages test-python36-build and
test-python36-runtime as a collection that extends rh-python36
Gh.
Stefan Ring wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Jiri Novak <jiri.no...@ghorland.net> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> a
ckage of this your new collection will set env right that new
> packages you want to build will have right %scl macro,... and will use
> right python and so on.
>
> Jiri Novak píše v St 22. 11. 2017 v 16:07 +0100:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the issue is that I don't have the rh-pytho
? if yes, which repo?
Dependence only on rh-python36 is not enough as it is built for python
2.7 instead, the scl related macros are not working without
rh-python36-build
Thanks,
Gh.
Stefan Ring wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Jiri Novak <jiri.no...@ghorland.net> wrote:
&g
