Hi,
Le 29/11/2017 à 15:35, Jiri Novak a écrit :
> the sclo packages will also write itself into
> /opt/rh/rh-python36/something, right?
$ rpm -qlp sclo-python35-python-bottle-0.12.9-5.el7.noarch.rpm
/opt/rh/rh-python35/root/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/__pycache__
/opt/rh/rh-python35/root/usr
Hi,
yes, the only way I managed to build so far was in the begining by
copying rh-python36-build from centos to my own repo. Which seems to be
wrong according to redhat, but I start to think its the only way :)
I've managed to make some dummy scl extending rh-python36 but still a
lot paths is som
I think there some confusion here.
The simple way to build additional package for an existing collection is
to install the -build package in the buildroot, which provides the
"overrides" stuff for needed macros.
This is exactly what is done by the SCLo SIG
Examples:
* sclo-php71 (additional pac
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Jiri Novak wrote:
> Stefan Ring wrote:
>>> What else is the right way to make RPM adding more libraries available
>>> when in scl enable rh-python36 bash?
>> Create your own mirror of rh-python36 and just add your packages to it?
> Sounds like dirty hack as rh-pyt
Stefan Ring wrote:
>> What else is the right way to make RPM adding more libraries available
>> when in scl enable rh-python36 bash?
> Create your own mirror of rh-python36 and just add your packages to it?
Sounds like dirty hack as rh-python36-build was intentionally not
shipped in rhel. or by mir
> What else is the right way to make RPM adding more libraries available
> when in scl enable rh-python36 bash?
Create your own mirror of rh-python36 and just add your packages to it?
___
SCLorg mailing list
SCLorg@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mail
Stefan Ring wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Jiri Novak wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I need to add more libraries to rh-python36, which would require using
>> rh-python36-build package and I've been told it is wring and I should do
>> my own SCL.
>>
>> then I need to make the application use the ex
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Jiri Novak wrote:
> Hi
>
> I need to add more libraries to rh-python36, which would require using
> rh-python36-build package and I've been told it is wring and I should do
> my own SCL.
>
> then I need to make the application use the extended SCL with added
> libr
GitHub.com/NLM-OCCS/occsab-python
> <https://GitHub.com/NLM-OCCS/occsab-python>
>
>
>
> Sent with BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
>
> *From: *Jiri Novak
> *Sent: *Nov 28, 2017 5:41 AM
> *
Hi
I need to add more libraries to rh-python36, which would require using
rh-python36-build package and I've been told it is wring and I should do
my own SCL.
then I need to make the application use the extended SCL with added
libraries.
Just running it agains rh-python36 is not enough because o
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Jiri Novak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> according to this (
> https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2014/12/04/add-packages-to-python-2-7-software-collection/
> ), I'm trying to create my own extension of the rh-python36, though
> doesn't build:
>
> + '[' '%{buildarch}' = noarch
Hi,
according to this (
https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2014/12/04/add-packages-to-python-2-7-software-collection/
), I'm trying to create my own extension of the rh-python36, though
doesn't build:
+ '[' '%{buildarch}' = noarch ']'
+ QA_CHECK_RPATHS=1
+ case "${QA_CHECK_RPATHS:-}" in
+ /usr/li
Hi, I've narrowed it down to what I need to place the packages in
/opt/rh instead if the /usr/lib/python2.7
%define scl rh-python36
%define scl_package_override()
%{expand:%{?python36_os_install_post:%global __os_install_post
%python36_os_install_post}
%global __python_requires %python36_python_re
Packages in collections with rh- prefix are part of RHSCL product and
developed by RedHat. So no modification (adding new packages) should be
done to these collections - it could cause confusion.
So solution to your problem is to create new collection. And -build
package of this your new collectio
- Original Message -
> From: "Pavel Valena"
> To: "Jiri Novak"
> Cc: sclorg@redhat.com
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 4:20:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [scl.org] rh-python36-build alternative in rhel
>
> - Original Message -
> >
- Original Message -
> From: "Jiri Novak"
> To: sclorg@redhat.com
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 4:07:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [scl.org] rh-python36-build alternative in rhel
>
> Hi,
>
> the issue is that I don't have the rh-python36-build in rh
Hi,
the issue is that I don't have the rh-python36-build in rhel (satellite)
and I didn't manage to find it on rhel site, so I assume it doesn't
exist and should be replaced somehow.
It doesn't sound right to install it via wget && rpm -i from centos.
Or am I wrong and it is somewhere? if yes, whi
Jiri Novak píše v St 22. 11. 2017 v 14:45 +0100:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently trying to port python app to use rh-python36 SCL (built
> using mock+rpmbuild), I've managed to make it build correctly in the
> scl
> paths (and using python3 for the packages that need it during build)
> if
> I install r
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Jiri Novak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently trying to port python app to use rh-python36 SCL (built
> using mock+rpmbuild), I've managed to make it build correctly in the scl
> paths (and using python3 for the packages that need it during build) if
> I install rh-
Hello,
I'm currently trying to port python app to use rh-python36 SCL (built
using mock+rpmbuild), I've managed to make it build correctly in the scl
paths (and using python3 for the packages that need it during build) if
I install rh-python36-build from centos to the mock root.
Is there a way to
20 matches
Mail list logo
