[scm-migration-dev] installing gpyfm

2007-04-20 Thread Richard Lowe
Mike Kupfer writes: > I'd like to get gpyfm installed well enough on my desktop that I can try > using it instead of FileMerge, even for work in Teamware workspaces. (I > expect it won't have Tooltalk support. That's fine; I'll cope.) > > So I see there's a copy of gpyfm and fm in usr/src/tools

[scm-migration-dev] installing gpyfm

2007-04-20 Thread Stephen Lau
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 05:33:07PM -0700, Mike Kupfer wrote: > I'd like to get gpyfm installed well enough on my desktop that I can try > using it instead of FileMerge, even for work in Teamware workspaces. (I > expect it won't have Tooltalk support. That's fine; I'll cope.) > > So I see there's

[scm-migration-dev] installing gpyfm

2007-04-20 Thread Mike Kupfer
I'd like to get gpyfm installed well enough on my desktop that I can try using it instead of FileMerge, even for work in Teamware workspaces. (I expect it won't have Tooltalk support. That's fine; I'll cope.) So I see there's a copy of gpyfm and fm in usr/src/tools in the onnv-scm repo. Do I ne

[scm-migration-dev] Re: SCM Migration

2007-04-20 Thread Stephen Lau
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:50:50PM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > I might have a go at updating nightly. Do you have anything written out > in more detail about this problem? I'm imaging the problem is that it > needs to know about /usr/closed vs. /usr/src, right? > Yeah, at the moment we've

[scm-migration-dev] Default assignee?

2007-04-20 Thread Bonnie Corwin
Stephen Lau wrote: > Rich brought up a good suggestion... make scm-migration-dev the default > assignee for all bug components within the 'SCM Migration' product. I > like it; what do people think? Sounds good to me. > > This would in effect make all new bug submissions, and bug email updates