> * What else?
newreci and the "hg diff --git" issues that Rich has come across.
We've been waffling about whether to keep the current recommit code (see
bug #333), and it would be good to get some closure on this question.
mike
http://bugs.grommit.com/show_bug.cgi?id=370
richlowe at richlowe.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Dean Roehrich writes:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 04:33:26PM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
>> Do you need this in the short term, or can you wait a few months? If
>> it's a short-term need, I don't think we'll be ready for you in time.
>
> I'll have a solution running on our internal server before t
This is a code review request for:
6680948 ON could use some common Perl and Python build rules
I ran into one small snag with the cmd/dtrace/demo makefile, but
things are otherwise quite straightforward. I'm aiming to get this
into snv_88.
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~carlsonj/webrev-6680948
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 04:33:26PM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
> Do you need this in the short term, or can you wait a few months? If
> it's a short-term need, I don't think we'll be ready for you in time.
I'll have a solution running on our internal server before the end of April.
> > An alter
Fri, 3/28/08
10:30am-11:00am PDT
Intl 865-673-9887
US 866-545-5223
AC 5540840
Proposed Agenda
* AI updates
AI: Bonnie will craft some email to start a separate
process discussion about how the ON RTI process will work.
NOT DONE
AI: Putting 0.9.5 on os.org ser
Dean Roehrich writes:
> My team may switch to mercurial and we'd like our central hg repository to
> validate a few things on each changeset. We'd like the server to verify the
Great to hear!
However, just to be clear: our current project scope is a little
narrower than you might be expecting.
Dean Roehrich writes:
> To revisit a concern of mine from late January...
>
> My team may switch to mercurial and we'd like our central hg repository to
> validate a few things on each changeset. We'd like the server to verify the
> format of the commit message (first line is the CR number, spac
Notes, SCM Migration Project Meeting
Fri, 3/21/08, 10:30am PST
Attendees:
Nathan Bush
John Beck
Bonnie Corwin
Mike Kupfer
Jim Walker
* AI Updates
AI: Mike will update the wiki and send a request to
scm-migration-dev to ask for a volunteer to take rti/rtichk.
DONE
AI: Bonnie w
Mike Kupfer writes:
> 441 P3 scm-migration-dev at opensolar... tools/Makefile.tools INS.pyfile
> shou...
I think you can scratch this from the list of pre-internal-review
bugs. I've split it into a component to go into ON (CR 6680948) and
another to go into our gate. The part for our gate
To revisit a concern of mine from late January...
My team may switch to mercurial and we'd like our central hg repository to
validate a few things on each changeset. We'd like the server to verify the
format of the commit message (first line is the CR number, space, CR synopsis,
second line is bl
http://bugs.grommit.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459
Summary: Mercurial issue 1052: diff -g copy handling is oddly
filename dependent
Product: SCM Migration
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
URL: http://www.selenic.com/mercurial
http://bugs.grommit.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440
james.d.carlson at sun.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|scm-migration- |james.d.carlson at sun.com
13 matches
Mail list logo
