Jim Walker writes:
> Richard Lowe wrote:
>> [this may arrive multiple times, smtp server keeps choking]
>>
>> Hey Jim,
>>
>> What's the current odds on you getting meld into sfwnv, and into a
>> Nevada build in the near future (guess a build that you'll more than
>> likely hit?)
>
> I planning on
Richard Lowe wrote:
> [this may arrive multiple times, smtp server keeps choking]
>
> Hey Jim,
>
> What's the current odds on you getting meld into sfwnv, and into a
> Nevada build in the near future (guess a build that you'll more than
> likely hit?)
I planning on mid May. It looks like the gno
Dean Roehrich writes:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 04:59:10PM -0600, Mark J. Nelson wrote:
>> >You're advocating dropping .hgtags on the floor (which I actually used
>> >to do, and I decided that was wrong), and stripping everything
>> >unreachable out of localtags. That is more far-reaching in eff
[this may arrive multiple times, smtp server keeps choking]
Hey Jim,
What's the current odds on you getting meld into sfwnv, and into a
Nevada build in the near future (guess a build that you'll more than
likely hit?)
I've been holding off pulling gpyfm out of onnv-scm, and our SUNWonbld
until
The summit organizers are soliciting abstracts for all the sessions.
Here's what I'm planning to send Jesse on Tuesday for the session "SCM
move to outside committers". If you've got any comments, let me know.
In this session we'll go over how Mercurial and Subversion can be
used today o
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 06:08:17AM -0400, Richard Lowe wrote:
> > If the user issues ^C while runchecks() is running then I have to find the
> > remote-side hg process and kill it to release the repository lock. It's not
> > clear to me that adding signal handling for SIGHUP to runchecks() would
>
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 04:59:10PM -0600, Mark J. Nelson wrote:
> >You're advocating dropping .hgtags on the floor (which I actually used
> >to do, and I decided that was wrong), and stripping everything
> >unreachable out of localtags. That is more far-reaching in effect
> >than what I'd been int
John Beck writes:
> Bonnie> Are others going to the TOI?
>
> I'm already familiar with the I to be T'd, so I won't be going. :-)
>
>
> Bonnie> Should we cancel today?
>
> I think it's more up to Rich and Mike and possibly Mark. Y'all?
>
I'm fine either way. If the agenda is just docs with Jim
Author: Richard Lowe
Repository: /hg/scm-migration/onnv-scm
Latest revision: f04643194acb832542ce86cb1e1bea1531105ce6
Total changesets: 1
Log message:
480 INS.pyfile's comment about python and mtime is slightly wrong (nit)
485 onnv-scm SUNWonbld needs copyright update
486 findunref and hg-active s
Notes, SCM Migration Project Meeting
Fri, 4/25/08, 10:30am-11:00am PDT
Attendees:
John Beck
Linda Bernal
Bonnie Corwin
Mike Kupfer
Rich Lowe
Bill Rushmore
* AI updates
AI: JimW send out test plan draft on 4/11/08.
AI: Mike will send a suggested outline for the Summit talk.
DONE
*
We couldn't remember during the concall today where I had put draft
"Developing in ON" slide deck. It's an attachment on the project web
page, with a link to it under "More Details".
mike
Richard Lowe wrote:
> John Beck writes:
>
>> Bonnie> Are others going to the TOI?
>>
>> I'm already familiar with the I to be T'd, so I won't be going. :-)
>>
>>
>> Bonnie> Should we cancel today?
>>
>> I think it's more up to Rich and Mike and possibly Mark. Y'all?
>>
>
> I'm fine either way.
> "John" == John Beck writes:
Bonnie> Should we cancel today?
John> I think it's more up to Rich and Mike and possibly Mark. Y'all?
Sorry for the late response--I got caught up reading mail.
Anyway, I will be dialing in. If we don't have anything to discuss,
it'll just be a short meeting
Jim Carlson is out of town so he won't be there.
Are others going to the TOI? Should we cancel today?
Thanks.
Bonnie
Jim Walker wrote:
> I may not make this.
>
> I'm giving a package porting TOI from 9-11am PT.
>
> Cheers,
> Jim
>
> Bonnie Corwin wrote:
>> Fri, 4/25/08
>> 10:30am-11:00am PD
I may not make this.
I'm giving a package porting TOI from 9-11am PT.
Cheers,
Jim
Bonnie Corwin wrote:
> Fri, 4/25/08
> 10:30am-11:00am PDT
>
> Intl 865-673-9887
> US 866-545-5223
> AC 5540840
Bonnie> Are others going to the TOI?
I'm already familiar with the I to be T'd, so I won't be going. :-)
Bonnie> Should we cancel today?
I think it's more up to Rich and Mike and possibly Mark. Y'all?
-- John
http://blogs.sun.com/jbeck
Fri, 4/25/08
10:30am-11:00am PDT
Intl 865-673-9887
US 866-545-5223
AC 5540840
Proposed Agenda
* AI updates
AI: JimW send out test plan draft on 4/11/08.
AI: Mike will send a suggested outline for the Summit talk.
* Summit Talk update
* Documentation update
* Training D
Dean Roehrich writes:
I'm not going to get chance to look at this fully for a while, but
there's a couple of bits I can mention.
> Can someone please tell me what kind of enforcement checks are run on a
> TeamWare gate? Obviously comchk isn't one of them... :)
Nothing is run in a way that is e
18 matches
Mail list logo
