[scm-migration-dev] 474 webrev chooses the wrong parent

2008-04-29 Thread richl...@richlowe.net
Author: Richard Lowe Repository: /hg/scm-migration/onnv-scm Latest revision: 64c41863b50fd862ae1e6c9da620f1a3565486e7 Total changesets: 1 Log message: 474 webrev chooses the wrong parent Files: update: usr/src/tools/scripts/webrev.sh

[scm-migration-dev] 412 backup cannot safely restore an uncommitted merge, should refuse to try

2008-04-29 Thread richl...@richlowe.net
Author: Richard Lowe Repository: /hg/scm-migration/cadtest Latest revision: 17f90680bba867c309c225a646f0b82c754d08df Total changesets: 1 Log message: 412 backup cannot safely restore an uncommitted merge, should refuse to try 464 ActiveList build doesn't consider one half of a working copy merge

[scm-migration-dev] 464 ActiveList build doesn't consider one half of a working copy merge

2008-04-29 Thread richl...@richlowe.net
Author: Richard Lowe Repository: /hg/scm-migration/onnv-scm Latest revision: b5606ea3382c481c836da0caa0abbc43a23b6c58 Total changesets: 1 Log message: 464 ActiveList build doesn't consider one half of a working copy merge Files: update: usr/src/tools/onbld/Scm/WorkSpace.py

[scm-migration-dev] Please somewhat review #474

2008-04-29 Thread Richard Lowe
"Mark J. Nelson" writes: > OK, I somewhat reviewed it. :) > > Why are you unhappy with the changes? They seem more straighforward > than the existing code, and eliminate some bothersome (and obviously > buggy) reimplementation of parenttip identification logic. > So, Mark and I talked about th

[scm-migration-dev] sync with onnv_89

2008-04-29 Thread richl...@richlowe.net
Author: Richard Lowe Repository: /hg/scm-migration/onnv-scm Latest revision: ba9deecbfac314951d07f88115cef8da57031cb2 Total changesets: 43 Log message: sync with onnv_89 Files: deleted_files/usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWcakrx.i/postinstall deleted_files/usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWcakrx.i/preremov

[scm-migration-dev] SCM Meeting first week in May

2008-04-29 Thread James Carlson
Bonnie Corwin writes: > How about just having a regular meeting on 5/2 and figure out there > what's needed for any longer meetings? OK by me. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington M

[scm-migration-dev] SCM Meeting first week in May

2008-04-29 Thread Richard Lowe
Bonnie Corwin writes: > Linda Bernal wrote: >> Ok, second shot at this. Thursday May 8th at 1:00pm. > > Mike isn't in on Thursdays. So we need to do Tue, Wed or Fri. > > However - since people will be on the phone regardless (since not > everyone will be in MPK next week), I'm thinking we shou

[scm-migration-dev] Please somewhat review #474

2008-04-29 Thread Mark J. Nelson
>> OK, I somewhat reviewed it. :) I'm happy if somebody else chimes in, but I did actually review this, and I think that (regardless of 473, or other hg_active changes that may be appropriate, this is cleaner than the existing code, and is worth changing as proposed. --Mark >> Why are you

[scm-migration-dev] abstract for SCM Migration session

2008-04-29 Thread Bonnie Corwin
Hi Mike, Looks ok to me. Thanks. Bonnie Mike Kupfer wrote: > The summit organizers are soliciting abstracts for all the sessions. > > Here's what I'm planning to send Jesse on Tuesday for the session "SCM > move to outside committers". If you've got any comments, let me know. > > In this

[scm-migration-dev] SCM Meeting first week in May

2008-04-29 Thread Bonnie Corwin
Linda Bernal wrote: > Ok, second shot at this. Thursday May 8th at 1:00pm. Mike isn't in on Thursdays. So we need to do Tue, Wed or Fri. However - since people will be on the phone regardless (since not everyone will be in MPK next week), I'm thinking we should not worry about a longer meetin