[scm-migration-dev] 551 minor DbLookups.py and Rti.py code review cleanup

2008-07-02 Thread mark.j.nel...@sun.com
Author: Mark J. Nelson Repository: /hg/scm-migration/onnv-scm Latest revision: bbc8c85c72d0e3384473e605b21ec870a2b808f6 Total changesets: 1 Log message: 551 minor DbLookups.py and Rti.py code review cleanup Files: update: usr/src/tools/onbld/Checks/DbLookups.py update: usr/src/too

[scm-migration-dev] [tools-discuss] SCCS keywords, hg and scripts

2008-07-02 Thread James Carlson
Valerie Bubb Fenwick writes: > On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Will Fiveash wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 09:46:11AM -0400, James Carlson wrote: > >> For now, until the transition, leave them in place as they are, and do > >> *NOT* build any code that relies on those strings. (Such code was > >> almost

[scm-migration-dev] 538 webrev(1) and hdrchk(1) nits

2008-07-02 Thread richl...@richlowe.net
Author: Richard Lowe Repository: /hg/scm-migration/onnv-scm Latest revision: b307f8df6fd4b9746e8260f1c447ec51332372ab Total changesets: 1 Log message: 538 webrev(1) and hdrchk(1) nits 539 webrev code review nits Files: update: usr/src/tools/scripts/hdrchk.1 update: usr/src/tools/s

[scm-migration-dev] [Bug 537] Checks.CStyle/JStyle will deadlock when the pipe buffer fills

2008-07-02 Thread bugzilla-dae...@np.grommit.com
http://bugs.grommit.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537 richlowe at richlowe.net changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|scm-migration- |richlowe at richlowe.net

[scm-migration-dev] New keyword policy

2008-07-02 Thread Mark J. Nelson
>>> 2) Have we agreed on a new form for the two problem children, >>> #ident/#pragma ident and the modinfo line? And if so, can we specify >>> that exactly to avoid as much thinking as possible when the new >>> requirements are thrust on gatelings innocent of all the discussion >>> and backgr

[scm-migration-dev] New keyword policy

2008-07-02 Thread Richard Lowe
Dan Mick writes: >>> 2) Have we agreed on a new form for the two problem children, >>> #ident/#pragma >>> ident and the modinfo line? And if so, can we specify that exactly to >>> avoid as >>> much thinking as possible when the new requirements are thrust on >>> gatelings >>> innocent of all