On 17-Sep-08, at 11:37 AM, Mark J. Nelson wrote:
>
> - I'm not thrilled with the explicit fallback from Monaco and/or
> BOO to DOO, especially not in the BugDB lookup method. I think the
> caller should be able to specify where to look for bugs, and how to
> prioritize those sources of inf
Richard Lowe wrote:
> Phi Tran writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have two changesets. Each changeset is for a different bug. I pull
>> both of the changeset into a new repository, merge, and commit. When I
>> do a webrev, the bug comments for both changeset shows up under each
>> file. How can I get t
Quoth Phi Tran on Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:21:03PM -0700:
> I have two changesets. Each changeset is for a different bug. I pull
> both of the changeset into a new repository, merge, and commit. When I
> do a webrev, the bug comments for both changeset shows up under each
> file. How can I get t
Hi,
I have two changesets. Each changeset is for a different bug. I pull
both of the changeset into a new repository, merge, and commit. When I
do a webrev, the bug comments for both changeset shows up under each
file. How can I get the right bug comment to show under the right
file?
Thanks,
http://bugs.grommit.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579
jmcp at opensolaris.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmcp at opensolaris.org
--- Co
---
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bghook.py
Type: text/x-python
Size: 14698 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/scm-migration-dev/attachments/20080917/629dacbd/attachment.py>
Author: dmarker
Repository: /hg/scm-migration/onnv-gk-tools
Latest revision: 31c303d99a38e4f550da3b97a517ea0a1cb34e57
Total changesets: 1
Log message:
provide a hook capable of running other collections of hooks in the background.
update cache.py to look for $TIP environment variable and fall back
FYI, for those of you not on sfwnv-discuss alias:
--Mark
Original Message
Subject: teamware->hg transition for sfwnv coming
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: mike.sulli...@sun.com
To: sfwnv-discuss at opensolaris.org
It is looking like we will be transitioning
John Sonnenschein wrote:
> Hey again,
>
> I need another code review ( on top of the one I need for
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~error404/140/ )
I replied to that one from the original request.
> new code:
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~error404/122/
- Aren't you missing an "else" and some inden
I also meant to say:
- Please make sure that you include doc strings where appropriate.
--Mark
Mark J. Nelson wrote:
> John Sonnenschein wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> could someone do a review of http://cr.opensolaris.org/~error404/140/
>> for me
>>
>> That change passes all the tests /ws/scmtest/src
John Sonnenschein wrote:
> Hello
>
> could someone do a review of http://cr.opensolaris.org/~error404/140/
> for me
>
> That change passes all the tests /ws/scmtest/src/legacy/scm/tooltest
> can throw at it
usr/src/tools/onbld/Checks/Comments.py:
- I might be missing something here, but it
http://bugs.grommit.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579
johnsonnenschein at gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|RTI check test suite fails |RTI check test suite fails
http://bugs.grommit.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579
Summary: RTI check test suite fails
Product: SCM Migration
Version: unspecified
Platform: i386 (64bit/AMD64)
OS/Version: Solaris 11/Nevada
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Prio
John Sonnenschein writes:
> Hey again,
>
> I need another code review ( on top of the one I need for
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~error404/140/ )
>
> new code:
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~error404/122/
>
> and the tests fail, but I'm blaming the tests, they try to touch boobug
> and monaco dir
Hey again,
I need another code review ( on top of the one I need for
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~error404/140/ )
new code:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~error404/122/
and the tests fail, but I'm blaming the tests, they try to touch boobug
and monaco directly, which have ceased to exist. New tests:
15 matches
Mail list logo
