On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 10:11:17 +1000
"James C. McPherson" wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:45:08 -0800
> Mike Kupfer wrote:
>
> > Oops, forgot to respond to something...
> >
> > > "meem" == Peter Memishian writes:
> >
> > meem> (I encourage those of you in MPK to try working with a remote
>
> "meem" == Peter Memishian writes:
meem> In other words, we're really just pushing the problem around.
I don't think that's true if the move is done skillfully.
I agree that if the foo code depends on private interfaces that are
exported by something else in ON, then foo is a bad candidate
On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:45:08 -0800
Mike Kupfer wrote:
> Oops, forgot to respond to something...
>
> > "meem" == Peter Memishian writes:
>
> meem> (I encourage those of you in MPK to try working with a remote ON
> meem> gate via Mercurial -- it is excruciatingly slow.)
>
> Are you using NF
